2017
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.160531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of nutritional deprivation on development and behavior in the subsocial beeCeratina calcarata(Hymenoptera: Xylocopinae)

Abstract: By manipulating resources or dispersal opportunities, mothers can force offspring to remain at the nest to help raise siblings, creating a division of labor. In the subsocial bee , mothers manipulate the quantity and quality of pollen provided to the first female offspring, producing a dwarf eldest daughter that is physically smaller and behaviorally subordinate. This daughter forages for her siblings and forgoes her own reproduction. To understand how the mother's manipulation of pollen affects the physiology… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
33
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with earlier studies showing that body size affects dominance in untreated B. terrestris (P. Van Doorn, 1989) and B. atratus worker bees (Matos and Garofalo, 1995). Body size is also correlated with dominance rank in other social bees (e.g., 2 6 carpenter bees, Withee and Rehan, (2016), Lawson et al, (2017); halictine bee, Smith and Weller, (1989)) as well as other social insects such as paper wasps (Cervo et al, 2008;Chandrashekara and Gadagkar, 1991;Zanette and Field, 2009) and queenless ants (Heinze and Oberstadt, 1999;Nowbahari et al, 1999;Trible and Kronauer, 2017). The common correlation between body size and dominance rank can be explained by the importance of body size in determining the outcome of the agonistic interactions that are used for the establishment of dominance hierarchies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These findings are consistent with earlier studies showing that body size affects dominance in untreated B. terrestris (P. Van Doorn, 1989) and B. atratus worker bees (Matos and Garofalo, 1995). Body size is also correlated with dominance rank in other social bees (e.g., 2 6 carpenter bees, Withee and Rehan, (2016), Lawson et al, (2017); halictine bee, Smith and Weller, (1989)) as well as other social insects such as paper wasps (Cervo et al, 2008;Chandrashekara and Gadagkar, 1991;Zanette and Field, 2009) and queenless ants (Heinze and Oberstadt, 1999;Nowbahari et al, 1999;Trible and Kronauer, 2017). The common correlation between body size and dominance rank can be explained by the importance of body size in determining the outcome of the agonistic interactions that are used for the establishment of dominance hierarchies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Larval nutrition affects brain morphology in honeybees, with queens having larger and more rapidly growing brains in the larval stage (Moda et al , ), and reduced larval nutrition results in smaller MB calyces at emergence in workers (Steijven et al , ), but this has not been studied in primitively eusocial groups. Variation in larval nutrition can affect reproductive physiology and behavior in other sweat bee species (Richards and Packer, ; Brand and Chapuisat, ) as well as other species of primitively eusocial insects (Judd et al , ; Lawson et al , ; ; Kapheim, ). Our previous work on this species suggests that queens manipulate larval pollen resources to create small, subordinate worker daughters (Smith et al , ; ; Kapheim et al , ; ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, just as queens are dominant, workers are subordinate and bullied by queen aggressive behaviors which leads to suppressed ovarian development and other physiological effects, including lower levels of JH (Smith et al , ; Hamilton et al , ). Queen manipulation of worker behavior and reproductive physiology extends to the larval stages as well because it is the foundress queen who controls the larval provisions provided to the developing workers (Michener and Brothers, ; Kapheim et al , ; Kapheim, ; Lawson et al , ). Thus, workers may have smaller MBs as a result of maternal manipulation of nutrition and/or behavioral aggression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the larvae of the sweat bee, Lasioglossum zephyrum, were offered pollen with differing protein contents, larvae that were fed protein-rich pollen grew to a larger size than those who were fed protein-poor pollen [61]. In another example, larvae of the subsocial bee, Ceratina calcarata, grew to a smaller adult size and had lower lipid stores when fed a diet with reduced amounts of pollen and nectar [62]. Similar effects have been observed in social bees as well.…”
Section: Floral Diversity: Impacts On Solitary Bee Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%