1975
DOI: 10.1016/0022-4804(75)90109-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of nutrition on tumor growth and tolerance to chemotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6) nor increase in host body weight (Fig. 7) were observed ; these facts are similar to those reported by Steiger (Steiger et al 1975). These findings imply that tumor growth is not directly related to calorie dosage but rather depends on the kind of amino acids administred.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…6) nor increase in host body weight (Fig. 7) were observed ; these facts are similar to those reported by Steiger (Steiger et al 1975). These findings imply that tumor growth is not directly related to calorie dosage but rather depends on the kind of amino acids administred.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It has been stated that parenteral nutri tional support may not only benefit the pa tient, since it also increases tumor growth [20]: the rate of tumor growth paralleled that of the host [21], However, even if nutritional repletion does stimulate tumor growth, che motherapeutic agents should be most effec tive when their administration coincides with accelerated tumor cell replication [22,23], No stimulation of tumor growth has been ob served in malnourished patients during short periods of nutritional repletion [24], Altogether, parenteral nutrition appears to somewhat benefit the healing of anastomoses in the intestine constructed during cytostatics administration. It also seems likely that the deleterious effects of cytostatics are lessened, to a certain degree, by intravenous saline alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many chemotherapeutic agents induce anorexia, diarrhea or nausea, and although those effects might decrease nutrient balance, little consideration has been given to the effect of selective chemotherapeutic agents on protein metabolism in experimental studies. In healthy rats treated with daily injection of 5-fluorouracil, N balance decreased after initiation of treatment and became progressively negative [7]. Similarly, a single injection of 4-epidoxorubicin reduced N balance by 55% over a 5-day study in tumor-bearing rats, but not in healthy animals [8].…”
Section: Treated Tumor-bearing Animal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%