2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-5131.2010.01022.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of nutrition on larval growth and survival in bivalves

Abstract: This review examines the nutritional factors that influence the growth and survival of larval bivalves. Factors considered include feed form (live phytoplankton, preserved phytoplankton and artificial feeds) and feed biochemical composition (protein, lipid, carbohydrate and essential fatty acids). These factors, as they relate to larval production, are discussed in terms of growth and survival rates. To facilitate comparisons among larval studies, growth rates and feeding rates are standardized to common units… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
77
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
(411 reference statements)
3
77
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the main variables significantly correlated with instantaneous oyster growth rate in the present study were components of the phytoplankton community. Diatoms are the preferred food for oysters (Dupuy et al 2000, Marshall et al 2010 and were positively correlated with oyster instantaneous growth at SI despite being scarce at this site. In contrast, dinoflagellates were correlated with instantaneous oyster growth at MB and TC, although the phytoplankton at MB was dominated by diatoms.…”
Section: Growthmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Similarly, the main variables significantly correlated with instantaneous oyster growth rate in the present study were components of the phytoplankton community. Diatoms are the preferred food for oysters (Dupuy et al 2000, Marshall et al 2010 and were positively correlated with oyster instantaneous growth at SI despite being scarce at this site. In contrast, dinoflagellates were correlated with instantaneous oyster growth at MB and TC, although the phytoplankton at MB was dominated by diatoms.…”
Section: Growthmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The greater food availability for larvae fed with 50,000 cells ml -1 day -1 showed no positive effect on the growth and/or survivorship of larvae of M. edulis, however, the effect of a better nutrition could express itself in the metamorphosis stage, either by increasing survivorship or by shortening the stage (Marshall et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially for I. galbana, it should be pointed out that the rather low contribution to total dietary CP, reduces the accuracy of extrapolation when assuming linearity in digestibility up to 100% of dietary CP. The poor CP digestibility of N. oceanica and I. galbana may be caused by the resistance of the thick and rigid algal cell wall to disruption by digestive processes (Becker, 2007;Marshall et al, 2010). Although there are no previous digestibility studies with mink, studies with other animals indicate that the digestibility of several algae species is dependent on disrupting the algal cell wall by proper processing (Saleh et al, 1985;Janczyk et al, 2005).…”
Section: Digestibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%