2018
DOI: 10.3390/su10051329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Non-Stationarity on Flood Frequency Analysis: Case Study of the Cheongmicheon Watershed in South Korea

Abstract: Due to global climate change, it is possible to experience the new trend of flood in the near future. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the impact of climate change on flood when establishing sustainable water resources management policy. In order to predict the future flood events, the frequency analysis is commonly applied. Traditional methods for flood frequency analysis are based on the assumption of stationarity, which is questionable under the climate change, although many techniques that are based … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather, an increase in the frequency of floods has been observed (Hirsch and Archfield, 2015). Prediction of the probability of flood events has traditionally been based on flood frequency analysis (Davie and Quinn, 2019) based on the assumption of flow stationarity (Kim et al, 2018;Do et al, 2020), defined by Milly et al (2008) as "natural systems fluctuating within an unchanging envelope of variability." However, climate and landscape change predict non-stationarity in rainfall and flood frequencies and the stationarity assumption of traditional flood frequency may no longer be applicable (Milly et al, 2008;Villarini et al, 2018).…”
Section: Flood Frequency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, an increase in the frequency of floods has been observed (Hirsch and Archfield, 2015). Prediction of the probability of flood events has traditionally been based on flood frequency analysis (Davie and Quinn, 2019) based on the assumption of flow stationarity (Kim et al, 2018;Do et al, 2020), defined by Milly et al (2008) as "natural systems fluctuating within an unchanging envelope of variability." However, climate and landscape change predict non-stationarity in rainfall and flood frequencies and the stationarity assumption of traditional flood frequency may no longer be applicable (Milly et al, 2008;Villarini et al, 2018).…”
Section: Flood Frequency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two meteorological drought indices, Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), and Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) were applied, and a hydrological drought index, Streamflow Drought Index (SDI), was used in determining drought from the simulation results of Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) using the two GCMs. The study area is the Cheongmicheon watershed, which has suffered from frequent droughts and thus has been a popular subject in Korea [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured hydrological data, particularly in developing countries such as Ethiopia can be limited, short, or nonexistent to the extent that they are far from representative of the basin under consideration [1,6]. A promising and elegant way to solve this problem is deriving the flood frequency curve by using the commonly used probability distribution functions, which is the most frequently used statistical method in hydrology all over the world [2,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Moreover, it is essential to note that the climate and land use changes, as well as human activities, have been known to alter the catchment flood response dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples for flood frequency analysis can be chosen based on the annual maximum flow or the annual peak flows over some defined truncation levels. The annual maximum flow method has been widely used for flood frequency analysis in different regions [2,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][25][26][27][28], in which the sample is defined by the maximum flow of each year of the study period. It is essential to note that the main drawbacks of relying on peaks over threshold method are the threshold selection and assuring independence criteria [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation