2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of non-ionic iodinated contrast media on patient heart rate and pressures during intra-cardiac or intra-arterial injection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used one type of compound and iodine concentration (iomeprol 400 mg I/ml) for all patients in our series. This compound is characterised by high iodine concentration/osmolality and there are claims that a higher osmolality may determine an increase in heart rate; however, the reports are not univocal on this finding [28][29][30]. We do not know if this effect can be related to the contrast material itself and/or to the warm sensation determined by contrast material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We used one type of compound and iodine concentration (iomeprol 400 mg I/ml) for all patients in our series. This compound is characterised by high iodine concentration/osmolality and there are claims that a higher osmolality may determine an increase in heart rate; however, the reports are not univocal on this finding [28][29][30]. We do not know if this effect can be related to the contrast material itself and/or to the warm sensation determined by contrast material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…13,14, Overall, 7166 patients; 3672 patients received iodixanol and 3494 patients received LOCM (Tables 1 and 2). Although several definitions of CIN were used, as listed in Table 1, most studies measured the postprocedure creatinine value at 1, 2, or 3 days (nϭ24).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 Since the publication of this study, several new randomized trials have been performed to better elucidate the role of iodixanol in radiographic procedures. [13][14][15] The goal of our meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of iodixanol compared with LOCM for prevention of CIN. We hypothesized that in a large analysis without exclusion of trials based on procedure type or population studied, the incidence of CIN would be reduced by iodixanol when compared with LOCM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 13 investigations were reported in the 2 prospective cross-sectional studies [2,3] and 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) [1,[7][8][9][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The study quality was generally excellent for the RCTs included, overall, two trials had a Jadad score of 5, five scored 4, two scored 3, and the remaining two scored 2.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%