2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on freezing of gait in parkinsonism: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results showed that rTMS had a beneficial effect on FOG in PD patients assessed by FOGQ and turning time. However, subgroup analysis according to stimulation site showed neither motor cortex stimulation nor frontal cortex stimulation had beneficial effect on FOG [153]. Other stimulation site has also been explored.…”
Section: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (Tms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed that rTMS had a beneficial effect on FOG in PD patients assessed by FOGQ and turning time. However, subgroup analysis according to stimulation site showed neither motor cortex stimulation nor frontal cortex stimulation had beneficial effect on FOG [153]. Other stimulation site has also been explored.…”
Section: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (Tms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inclusion criteria for study selection were: (1) randomized controlled trials (RCTs; parallel or crossover design) and (2) feasibility and pilot RCT studies, that assess the effectiveness of physiotherapy intervention compared to other intervention or no intervention on FOG symptoms in subjects with idiopathic PD; and (3) provided the FOG questionnaire (FOG-Q) 24,25 or new FOG (nFOG-Q) questionnaire 28 data, available in the article or upon request. Exclusion criteria were: (1) single-session interventions, (2) nonphysiotherapy interventions (e.g., dance, tai-chi), (3) noninvasive brain stimulation or the use of external devices not associated with physiotherapy, and (4) abstract and conference proceedings.…”
Section: Eligibility Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) provided the FOG questionnaire (FOG-Q) 24,25 or new FOG (nFOG-Q) questionnaire 28 data, available in the article or upon request. Exclusion criteria were:…”
Section: Eligibility Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six of the studies compared the effects between real and sham rTMS, while one study performed dual stimulation comparing the effects of rTMS + tDCS and rTMS + sham tDCS. In a meta‐analysis of these six studies (91 PD patients), rTMS showed a beneficial effect on FoG questionnaire scores and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)–III in PD patients (104). However, there were no significant differences in turning steps, turning time, or Timed Up and Go.…”
Section: Targets Of Neuromodulationmentioning
confidence: 99%