2014
DOI: 10.1080/00380768.2014.893812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of nitrogen and sulfur deposition on CH4and N2O fluxes in high-altitude peatland soil under different water tables in the Tibetan Plateau

Abstract: The effects of nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) deposition on methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions under low (10 cm below soil surface) and high (at soil surface) water tables were investigated in the laboratory. Undisturbed soil columns from the alpine peatland of the Tibetan Plateau were analyzed. CH 4 emission was higher and N 2 O emission was lower at the high water table than those at the low water table regardless of nutrient application. Addition of N (NH 4 NO 3 (ammonium nitrate), 5 g N m −2 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau has the world's largest extent of alpine peatlands, where alpine peatland soils and alpine meadow soils contain large amounts of organic C and N, and thus have a significant potential to influence the whole plateau atmospheric budget of greenhouse gases (Gao et al 2014;Wu et al 2010). Alpine peatland soils are usually sources of CO 2 , CH 4 , and N 2 O (Chen et al 2011(Chen et al , 2012Wang et al 2005), while alpine meadow soils are sources of CO 2 and N 2 O, but a sink of CH 4 (Jiang et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau has the world's largest extent of alpine peatlands, where alpine peatland soils and alpine meadow soils contain large amounts of organic C and N, and thus have a significant potential to influence the whole plateau atmospheric budget of greenhouse gases (Gao et al 2014;Wu et al 2010). Alpine peatland soils are usually sources of CO 2 , CH 4 , and N 2 O (Chen et al 2011(Chen et al , 2012Wang et al 2005), while alpine meadow soils are sources of CO 2 and N 2 O, but a sink of CH 4 (Jiang et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, studies on the ecological processes of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau have traditionally focused on the growing season, while ecological processes during winter are often ignored. In this study, soils were obtained from alpine meadow and alpine peatland ecosystems in the eastern region of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, an area that contains world's largest extent of high-altitude peatlands (Gao et al 2014), to simulate freezing and thawing under laboratory conditions. The purposes of this study were to determine the release rates of CO 2 , CH 4 , and N 2 O during the thawing of frozen soils from different alpine ecosystems, to determine the availability of DOC, DON, NO 3 − -N, NH 4 + -N, and NO 2 − -N, and to compare the effects of different freezing temperatures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a). This is supported by the results of an experiment using soil columns in a peatland of the eastern Tibetan Plateau (Gao et al ., ) showing that N addition inhibits CH 4 emissions. The indirect influence was caused by the increased plant ANPP, which benefits CH 4 emissions (Hirota et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value is well above the SO 4 2saturation concentrations of 300-3000 μmol•L -1 , reported for SRB (Vile et al, 2003), which suggests that the SO 4 2concentration in the high marsh in Min River estuary was at saturation, with the effect of SO 4 2on sulfate reduction being minor. The situation is different compared to studies on natural peatland and freshwater wetlands, where an increase in SO 4 2availability in low SO 4 2environments can significantly stimulate SRB, which then consume more substrate and inhibit methanogens (Gao et al, 2014). Vile et al (2003) speculated that if methanogens and SRB dominate different vertical depths of the soil, with the SRB community showing more superficial distribution relative to the methanogens, the methanogens might not be exposed to exogenous SO 4 2-, thus not being competitively inhibited.…”
Section: Sulfate Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 93%