1992
DOI: 10.1104/pp.100.2.644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Nitrite, Chlorate, and Chlorite on Nitrate Uptake and Nitrate Reductase Activity

Abstract: Effects of N02-, C103-, and C102-on the induction of nitrate transport and nitrate reductase activity (NRA) as well as their effects on N03-influx into roots of intact barley (Hordeum vulgare cv Klondike) seedlings were investigated. A 24-h pretreatment with 0.1 mol m-3 N02-fully induced N03-transport but failed to induce NRA. Similar pretreatments with C103-and C102-induced neither N03-transport nor NRA. Net C103-uptake was induced by N03-but not by C103-itself, indicating that N03-and C103-transport occur vi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
1
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
25
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5A). This is in conflict with the results of Siddiqi et al (1992), who found that NOZ-did not induce NR. In our study, the accumulation of NO3-in the roots supplied with higher concentrations of NOz-suggests that enzyme induction may have resulted from NO3-produced by the oxidation of absorbed NOz-.…”
Section: Lnduction Of Nrcontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5A). This is in conflict with the results of Siddiqi et al (1992), who found that NOZ-did not induce NR. In our study, the accumulation of NO3-in the roots supplied with higher concentrations of NOz-suggests that enzyme induction may have resulted from NO3-produced by the oxidation of absorbed NOz-.…”
Section: Lnduction Of Nrcontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…In a preliminary report, we showed that NR was induced in barley roots by both NO3-and NOz-and also that NOS-appeared in roots after feeding with NOz- (Aslam et al, 1992b). In contrast, Siddiqi et al (1992) recently reported that 0.1 m NOZ-did not induce NR in barley roots during a 24-h induction period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…If it was assumed that all of the NO,-were localized in the cytoplasm, then the NO,-concentration of that compartment could be estimated based on the assumption that the cytoplasm occupies approximately 5% of the cell volume (Lee and Ratcliffe, 1983). Using this assumption Siddiqi et al (1992) estimated the cytoplasmic NO,-concentration to be 2.8 mM in roots and 0.16 to 0.2 mM in shoots. Although these levels are 2 to 3 times lower than the concentration of NO,-used in this study, the rate of proton-linked NO,-movement across the membrane clearly has the capacity to move higher concentrations of NO,-across the membrane very rapidly.…”
Section: No--dependent Acidification In Asolectin Vesiclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the rate of proton-linked NO,-transport is approximately 5 to 80 times greater than the measured activity of NO,-reductase in chloroplasts. The NO,-content in shoot and root tissues of barley plants grown with NO,-as the sole nitrogen source has been measured (Siddiqi et al, 1992). If it was assumed that all of the NO,-were localized in the cytoplasm, then the NO,-concentration of that compartment could be estimated based on the assumption that the cytoplasm occupies approximately 5% of the cell volume (Lee and Ratcliffe, 1983).…”
Section: No--dependent Acidification In Asolectin Vesiclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In support of this idea, Bloom and Sukrapanna (1990) observed high initial rates of Nos-uptake in plants grown with NH4+ as the sole nitrogen source. Similarly, Siddiqi et al (1992) demonstrated that pretreatments with 100 p~ NOzproduced barley plants with high initial rates of Nos-uptake, although in earlier investigations Tompkins et al (1978) found that NOz--pretreatments inhibited the induction of Nos-uptake.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%