2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2008.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of new variables on the overtopping discharge at steep rubble mound breakwaters — The Zeebrugge case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prototype measurements show overtopping discharges that are a factor 1 to 7 of the scaled model results with largest differences for small overtopping discharges. Geeraerts et al (2008) also presented results from the UPV model tests with wind. These tests showed that in a small scale model (1:30) wind velocities of 5-7 m/s may easily increase small overtopping discharges by a factor five.…”
Section: Prototype Measurements and The Effect Of Windmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prototype measurements show overtopping discharges that are a factor 1 to 7 of the scaled model results with largest differences for small overtopping discharges. Geeraerts et al (2008) also presented results from the UPV model tests with wind. These tests showed that in a small scale model (1:30) wind velocities of 5-7 m/s may easily increase small overtopping discharges by a factor five.…”
Section: Prototype Measurements and The Effect Of Windmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The prototype overtopping measurements from Zeebrugge were reproduced in two laboratories, Leichtweiss-Institute for Hydraulics (LWI) and Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (UPV) (Geeraerts et al, 2008). In these tests the measured prototype spectra were reproduced as accurate as possible in the model, with matching of the power spectrum but not the phase spectrum, i.e.…”
Section: Prototype Measurements and The Effect Of Windmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same port was also studied in a later work [24]. A similar method was used to study the Zeebrugge port in Belgium [25].…”
Section: Overtopping: In Situ Measuringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Eulerian numerical methods usually require expensive mesh generation and have severe technical challenges associated with the nonlinearities associated with rapidly moving geometries. On the other hand, meshless schemes provide an alternative to the most established meshbased methods and meshfree methods, such as Monte Carlo methods (Geeraerts et al 2009) or the particle finite element method (PFEM) (Oñate et al 2011), are gaining popularity. Within the meshless methods now available, smoothed particle hydrodynamics (Violeau 2012) is, possibly, the most popular and is attaining the required level of maturity to be used for engineering purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%