2014
DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of new mutations on fitness: insights from models and data

Abstract: The rates and properties of new mutations affecting fitness have implications for a number of outstanding questions in evolutionary biology. Obtaining estimates of mutation rates and effects has historically been challenging, and little theory has been available for predicting the distribution of fitness effects (DFE); however, there have been recent advances on both fronts. Extreme-value theory predicts the DFE of beneficial mutations in well-adapted populations, while phenotypic fitness landscape models make… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
84
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
3
84
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of experimental studies have made strides towards characterizing the effect and size of new mutations affecting fitness. Mutation accumulation and directed mutagenesis experiments, now in combination with genome sequencing, have given us much insight into the distribution of effects of all arising mutations in a range of model organisms (Halligan & Keightley ), while experimental evolution studies have given us insight into the effects of mutations directly responsible for increases in fitness (recent review by Bataillon & Bailey ). In general, these experiments suggest that while the majority of mutations appear to have nearly neutral effects, it is mutations of intermediate effects that tend to drive adaptive evolution.…”
Section: What Kinds Of Mutations Enable Adaptation?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of experimental studies have made strides towards characterizing the effect and size of new mutations affecting fitness. Mutation accumulation and directed mutagenesis experiments, now in combination with genome sequencing, have given us much insight into the distribution of effects of all arising mutations in a range of model organisms (Halligan & Keightley ), while experimental evolution studies have given us insight into the effects of mutations directly responsible for increases in fitness (recent review by Bataillon & Bailey ). In general, these experiments suggest that while the majority of mutations appear to have nearly neutral effects, it is mutations of intermediate effects that tend to drive adaptive evolution.…”
Section: What Kinds Of Mutations Enable Adaptation?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the genetic basis of resistance to a variety of drugs is known in many species of bacteria (reviewed in MacLean et al 2010), fungi (reviewed in Robbins et al 2017), and viruses (reviewed in Yilmaz et al 2016). This abundance of data reflects both the applied need to prevent drug resistance and the relative ease of isolating the genotypes that survive (hereafter “rescue genotypes”), e.g., in a Luria-Delbrück fluctuation assay (reviewed in Bataillon and Bailey 2014). Assaying fitness in the environment used to isolate mutants (e.g., in the drug) then provides the distribution of fitness effects of potential rescue genotypes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/062216 doi: bioRxiv preprint first posted online Jul. 5, 2016;Bataillon and Bailey 2014). The DFE has been modeled 334 using a wide range of functional continuous forms (Boyko et al 335 2008; Kousathanas and Keightley 2013;Galtier 2016), but also 336 as a discrete distribution (Gronau et al 2013;Kousathanas and comes from an exponential distribution with mean S b > 0 (Fig-345 ure 2A).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%