1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf02184241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of negatively charged aerosol on blood and cerebrospinal fluid parameters in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from 39 tests extracted from three of these studies are summarized in Additional file 2 : Figure S8. Wehner et al [ 123 ] exposed rats in a single group of 10 animals to negative air ion aerosols for 90–140 min and then analyzed for 21 blood components typically included in general blood work-ups for humans and for pH and Ca ++ concentration in cerebrospinal fluid. One of these measures, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, differed modestly from the control group at p < 0.01 and the authors considered this finding as likely due to chance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data from 39 tests extracted from three of these studies are summarized in Additional file 2 : Figure S8. Wehner et al [ 123 ] exposed rats in a single group of 10 animals to negative air ion aerosols for 90–140 min and then analyzed for 21 blood components typically included in general blood work-ups for humans and for pH and Ca ++ concentration in cerebrospinal fluid. One of these measures, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, differed modestly from the control group at p < 0.01 and the authors considered this finding as likely due to chance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bailey and Charry [ 57 , 78 , 82 ] used a specially-designed exposure system evaluated by the US National Bureau of Standards to prevent such confounders [ 130 ]. For a few other ion generation systems there would appear to be little need for control measures on gaseous by-products [ 108 , 109 , 123 ]. Overall, the studies that addressed the greatest number of confounding variables related to the use of a corona discharge system for the generation of air ions were Olivereau and Lambert [ 48 ], Bailey and Charry [ 57 , 78 , 82 ], and Creim et al [ 59 , 64 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%