2004
DOI: 10.1139/t04-058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of near-surface environmental conditions on instability of an unsaturated soil slope

Abstract: In 1999, after a period of extensive rainfall, two shallow slope failures developed in the right-of-way of Provincial Road 259 near Virden, Manitoba. The rainfall caused dissipation of soil suction in the near-surface soil, thereby reducing shear resistance and triggering failure. A research project was initiated between the Geotechnical Group at the University of Manitoba and the Manitoba Department of Highways and Transportation to assess the mechanism of failure. The project included a field investigation p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
18
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Early attempts to incorporate the effect of soil-atmosphere interaction in numerical analysis were focused mainly on adopting a summer and a winter undrained shear strength profile for London clay (Vaughan 1994) or summer and winter pwp profiles (e.g., Russell et al 2000;Kovacevic et al 2001;Nyambayo et al 2004;O'Brien et al 2004; Lees et al 2013). An alternative approach employed in the literature (e.g., Krahn et al 1989;Tsaparas et al 2002;Blatz et al 2004;Rouainia et al 2009;Rahardjo et al 2012) consists of running two independent analyses: one for the calculation of pwps from meteorological, vegetation, and permeability data and one for the calculation of slope stability from the obtained pwps. Although the latter approach has the advantage that pwps are calculated rather than prescribed, and as such the corresponding flow rates are consistent with the infiltration and evapotranspiration rates, this is a noncoupled approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early attempts to incorporate the effect of soil-atmosphere interaction in numerical analysis were focused mainly on adopting a summer and a winter undrained shear strength profile for London clay (Vaughan 1994) or summer and winter pwp profiles (e.g., Russell et al 2000;Kovacevic et al 2001;Nyambayo et al 2004;O'Brien et al 2004; Lees et al 2013). An alternative approach employed in the literature (e.g., Krahn et al 1989;Tsaparas et al 2002;Blatz et al 2004;Rouainia et al 2009;Rahardjo et al 2012) consists of running two independent analyses: one for the calculation of pwps from meteorological, vegetation, and permeability data and one for the calculation of slope stability from the obtained pwps. Although the latter approach has the advantage that pwps are calculated rather than prescribed, and as such the corresponding flow rates are consistent with the infiltration and evapotranspiration rates, this is a noncoupled approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of a numerical analysis is that it can incorporate more sophisticated and advanced models of soil hydraulic properties Rahardjo, 1997a, 1997b). Numerous numerical studies (Blatz et al, 2004;Gasmo et al, 2000;Ng and Shi, 1998a Chen and Zhang (2006) and Zhang and Chen (2006); Flow3D (Gerscovich, 1994); and FEMWATER (Lin et al, 1997), as in Ng et al (2001). Of particular concern is that, when an interface between two porous media is present, preferential infiltration may take place along the interface Zhang and Chen, 2006).…”
Section: Analytical and Numerical Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although numerous field investigations (Blatz et al, 2004;Cui et al, 2005Cui et al, , 2010Gasmo et al, 1999;Kim and Lee, 2010;Li et al, 2005;Li et al, 2011;Lim et al, 1996;Ng et al, 2003;Rahardjo et al, 2005;Tsaparas et al, 2003;Tu et al, 2009;Zhan et al, 2007;Zhang et al, 2000) and laboratory model tests (Huang et al, 2008;Huat et al, 2006;Li et al, 2009b;Moriwaki et al, 2004;Take et al, 2004;Tohari et al, 2007) have been conducted on soil moisture responses to rainfall, comparisons of measured and calculated pore water pressure profiles (Trandafir et al, 2008) and changes in pore water pressure with time (Alonso et al, 2003;Huat et al, 2006;Lan et al, 2003;Sako et al, 2006) are still limited. It is very difficult to find a unique set of soil hydraulic parameters that could match all transient pore water pressure responses (Trandafir et al, 2008).…”
Section: Analytical and Numerical Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, researchers have not been in a position to accurately predict landslide occurrence and plan response strategies for events such as typhoons and the heavy rains where the effects of rainfall infiltration on landslide activity are not negligible. Consequently, integrating rainfall infiltration and groundwater seepage into slope stability models has become a focus of natural hazard mitigation efforts in recent years (Bozzano et al 2002;Blatz et al 2004;Cascini et al 2006;Guzzetti et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%