2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of near-fault ground motions and equivalent pulses on multi-story structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
93
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that rocking structures are also particularly vulnerable to long-period ground motions and more precisely, to the persistence of the pulse (Ishiyama 1984;Spanos and Koh 1984;Augusti and Sinopoli 1992;Manos and Demosthenous 1996;Konstantinidis and Makris 2005;Manos et al 2013). In tall buildings, which are similarly vulnerable to long periods, the Peak Ground Velocity (PGV) was found to be a more efficient IM compared to the Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) or Spectral acceleration (Sa) (Sehhati et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that rocking structures are also particularly vulnerable to long-period ground motions and more precisely, to the persistence of the pulse (Ishiyama 1984;Spanos and Koh 1984;Augusti and Sinopoli 1992;Manos and Demosthenous 1996;Konstantinidis and Makris 2005;Manos et al 2013). In tall buildings, which are similarly vulnerable to long periods, the Peak Ground Velocity (PGV) was found to be a more efficient IM compared to the Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) or Spectral acceleration (Sa) (Sehhati et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kalkan and Kunnath (2006) stated that near-fault ground motions including fling step and forward directivity pulses can significantly activate higher modes of the structure compared to ordinary ground motions. Sehhati et al (2011) proposed a range of pulse-to-structure period ratios in which structural response can be estimated by equivalent pulses. Xu and Agrawal (2010) demonstrated that pulse components of near-fault records are the main cause of the maximum demands on structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger Tpulse/Tstructure, the higher inter-story drift ratio especially in lower stories [32]. According to ASCE 41-13 and ASCE 7, members' plastic hinge rotation and maximum nonlinear inter-story drift ratio are well-known as the current seismic performance indicators, associated with structural components (local scale) and whole structure (global scale), respectively.…”
Section: Inter-story Drift Ratio Demand and Damage Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%