2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.01.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Nb and Zr on structural stabilities of Ti-Mo-Sn-based alloys with low modulus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in which the coefficient before each alloying element was obtained by the slope ratio of the [β/ (α + β)] phase boundary of the binary Ti-M phase diagram to that of the Ti-Mo, representing the contribution of each element to the β structural stability 9,19 . The critical lower limit of β stabilization is determined as (Mo eq ) C = 11.8 wt.%, indicating that any alloy with a larger Mo eq value above 11.8 wt.% would exhibit a single BCC β-Ti structure 9,19 . It is known that in the vicinity of the lower limit of β stabilization, some second phases of ω, α′′, and α′ could be precipitated inevitably since they are sensitive to the preparation processing and heat treatments, resulting in an increase of E 20 .…”
Section: Characteristic Parameters In Low-e β-Ti Alloysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…in which the coefficient before each alloying element was obtained by the slope ratio of the [β/ (α + β)] phase boundary of the binary Ti-M phase diagram to that of the Ti-Mo, representing the contribution of each element to the β structural stability 9,19 . The critical lower limit of β stabilization is determined as (Mo eq ) C = 11.8 wt.%, indicating that any alloy with a larger Mo eq value above 11.8 wt.% would exhibit a single BCC β-Ti structure 9,19 . It is known that in the vicinity of the lower limit of β stabilization, some second phases of ω, α′′, and α′ could be precipitated inevitably since they are sensitive to the preparation processing and heat treatments, resulting in an increase of E 20 .…”
Section: Characteristic Parameters In Low-e β-Ti Alloysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other solute atoms having weak interactions with the base (a positive ΔH) are certainly required to fill the space among clusters for the balance of atomic-packing density, named as glue atoms 37 . Thus, an uniform composition formula [cluster](glue atom) m (m being the glue-atom number) can be abstracted from this model, which is called the cluster-formula approach 18,19 . Specifically, in the Ti-Mo-Nb-Zr-Sn-Ta multicomponent system, Mo and Sn occupy preferentially the cluster center due to the relatively strong interactions with Ti (ΔH Ti-Mo = −4 kJ/mol, ΔH Ti-Sn = −21 kJ/ mol), while Nb and Ta tend to occupy the glue sites owing to their weak interactions with Ti (ΔH Ti-Nb = +2 kJ/mol, ΔH Ti-Ta = +1 kJ/ mol).…”
Section: Characteristic Parameters In Low-e β-Ti Alloysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the alloys may suffer from biomechanical incompatibility. There is a difference between the elastic modulus of the material (ca 105 GPa) and the modulus of bone (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) GPa for cortical and 1-4 GPa for trabecular bone) [3]. This difference may cause the loss of mechanical bond because the regeneration of the bone tissue is probably controlled via mechanical stimulation of osteocytes [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, a high concentration of β-stabilizing elements results in the occurrence of a martensitic alpha phase with an orthorhombic lattice. This structure reduces tensile strength, fatigue strength and hardness [19][20][21]. However, the presence of alpha and omega phases can be suppressed by tin alloying, and the Young moduli of these alloys are about 40 GPa [16,[22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%