2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of natural solar UV-B radiation on three Arabidopsis accessions are strongly affected by seasonal weather conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The seasonal I flav trend for higher values in spring and autumn, is likely partly explained by low temperatures experienced by understorey species in these periods. Our I flav trends resembled the seasonal patterns in flavonoids attributed to temperature in an outdoor experiment attenuating UV radiation from different Arabidopsis accessions and genotypes (Coffey et al, 2017;Coffey and Jansen, 2019). Earlier studies have found changes in epidermal UV-transmittance at moderate temperatures ranging from + 9 to 21°C (Bilger et al, 2007), which likely falls within the range of summertime fluctuations in the stands we studied (e.g.…”
Section: Potential Interactions Of Seasonal Changes In Temperature Ansupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The seasonal I flav trend for higher values in spring and autumn, is likely partly explained by low temperatures experienced by understorey species in these periods. Our I flav trends resembled the seasonal patterns in flavonoids attributed to temperature in an outdoor experiment attenuating UV radiation from different Arabidopsis accessions and genotypes (Coffey et al, 2017;Coffey and Jansen, 2019). Earlier studies have found changes in epidermal UV-transmittance at moderate temperatures ranging from + 9 to 21°C (Bilger et al, 2007), which likely falls within the range of summertime fluctuations in the stands we studied (e.g.…”
Section: Potential Interactions Of Seasonal Changes In Temperature Ansupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Similarly, seasonal changes in the short-term accumulation of flavonoids in Arabidopsis were also found to persist even when UV was attenuated (Coffey et al, 2017). The trends reported in these studies and ours all point to other environmental factors or developmental processes that co-vary seasonally with UV radiation also being implicated in driving trends in flavonoids (Liakoura et al, 2001;Kotilainen et al, 2010;Nenadis et al, 2015;Coffey and Jansen, 2019). In the next sections we try to disentangle these possible mechanisms affecting epidermal UV absorbance and flavonoid accumulation seasonally.…”
Section: Does Uv Radiation Explain the Trends In I Flav ?supporting
confidence: 53%
“…A decrease in UV-mediated induction of UV-absorbing compounds has been described under low-PAR conditions (Cen and Bornman, 1990; Gotz et al , 2010; Klem et al , 2012). More recently, Coffey et al , (2017) and Coffey and Jansen (2018) have reported an absence of induction of UV-absorbing compounds in Arabidopsis plants grown outdoors under different UV filters. Interestingly, these experiments were performed across different seasons in a temperate climatic area, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the lower flavonol accumulation among shade-intolerant species in the common-garden experiment than in the field may constitute a response to the relatively low irradiance, while the opposite pattern for the shade-tolerant species may be explained by the greater temperature fluctuations in the experiment and comparatively low irradiance in their native environment ( Figure S5). Since temperature interferes with photoreceptor responses known to be involved in leaf pigment accumulation (Coffey & Jansen, 2019;Pescheck & Bilger, 2019), the warmer temperatures in the common-garden experiment than that in the native habitat of these species might modulate some of these responses, particularly in the shade-tolerant species. If so, this may skew the pattern of results for shade-tolerant species, which may be more like those of shade-intolerant species, making the differences between the groups smaller.…”
Section: Differences In Plasticity To Spectral Regions Between Funcmentioning
confidence: 99%