2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of nano-scale TiO2, ZnO and their bulk counterparts on zebrafish: Acute toxicity, oxidative stress and oxidative damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

29
237
2
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 515 publications
(288 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
29
237
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…1b). This size effect difference is also reported by comparative cytotoxicity studies between fine and ultrafine materials 11 but not as the cause of ECL. We tested two other similarly sized NM, silicon dioxide and silver, and observed that these two other NM also caused ECL (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…1b). This size effect difference is also reported by comparative cytotoxicity studies between fine and ultrafine materials 11 but not as the cause of ECL. We tested two other similarly sized NM, silicon dioxide and silver, and observed that these two other NM also caused ECL (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Earlier studies supporting this hypothesis demonstrated significant decreases in various markers of toxicity (including survival, reproduction, and markers of oxidative stress) following exposure to micrometer-sized relative to nanosized (≤50 nm) TiO 2 for species such as zebrafish, 69 lugworms, 58 and nematodes. 70 However, the earthworm metabolic responses observed in the current study were very similar for both sizes of TiO 2 materials used (Figures 1and 2).…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The antioxidant defense systems include a series of antioxidative enzymes and low-molecular non-enzymatic antioxidants, such as SOD activities, CAT activities and contents of MDA and GSH, which were all appropriate for monitoring oxidative stress status of fish after exposure to nano metal oxides (Hao et al 2009;Xiong et al 2011;Hao and Chen 2012;Lee et al 2012;Clemente et al 2013), in spite of the fact that some of the biomarker responses appear inconsistent because the mechanism is indirect as a consequence of the occlusion of tissue surfaces rather than more readily interpreted doseresponse relations. Indeed, the biomarker response varied in different organs and organs varied different sensitivity (detailed below), indicating possibly different toxicity mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, gill is the primary organ contacting water born TiO 2 NPs, and gill could be suffering serious threat when TiO 2 NPs sticks to gill surface (Hao et al 2009;Xiong et al 2011;Hao and Chen 2012). Absolutely, gill is a more sensitive organ than others to monitor oxidative damage caused by TiO 2 NPs exposure, reflected by obvious change of SOD activities and content of MDA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation