Effects of Musical Training and Hearing Loss on Fundamental Frequency Discrimination and Temporal Fine Structure Processing: Psychophysics and Modeling
Abstract:Several studies have shown that musical training leads to improved fundamental frequency (
F
0
) discrimination for young listeners with normal hearing (NH). It is unclear whether a comparable effect of musical training occurs for listeners whose sensory encoding of
F
0
is degraded. To address this question, the effect of musical training was investigated for three groups of listeners (young NH, older NH, and older listeners with hearing i… Show more
“…We did not find evidence of age effects on F0 discrimination of unresolved complex tones in the current study, consistent with the results of Bianchi, Carney, Dau, Santurette, 2019 . Although our results rule out the hypothesis that age per se may have large effects on F0 discrimination of unresolved complex tones, the CIs for the age effect were not very narrow, and are compatible with the possibility that small age effects exist but were not detected in the current study.…”
Highlights
We found little evidence of greater age-related hearing declines at high sound levels.
There are age-related temporal-processing declines independent of hearing loss.
No evidence of age-related speech-reception deficits independent of hearing loss.
“…We did not find evidence of age effects on F0 discrimination of unresolved complex tones in the current study, consistent with the results of Bianchi, Carney, Dau, Santurette, 2019 . Although our results rule out the hypothesis that age per se may have large effects on F0 discrimination of unresolved complex tones, the CIs for the age effect were not very narrow, and are compatible with the possibility that small age effects exist but were not detected in the current study.…”
Highlights
We found little evidence of greater age-related hearing declines at high sound levels.
There are age-related temporal-processing declines independent of hearing loss.
No evidence of age-related speech-reception deficits independent of hearing loss.
“…Bianchi et al. (2019) observed that both NH and HI musicians with at least 8 years of formal music education showed lower IPD FLs than nonmusicians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In this study, we adopted a training paradigm that has been used in many previous studies exploring IPD discrimination with tone sequence stimuli (e.g., Bianchi et al., 2019; Füllgrabe et al., 2017; Hopkins & Moore, 2011; Neher et al., 2011): IPD cues were initially replaced with ILD cues, because ILD cues presumably result in more discriminable lateralization for all participants, in particular for older HI listeners. However, Ortiz and Wright (2010) found that, in order to improve NH listeners’ ITD discrimination performance, training based on ITD discrimination proved more effective than ILD discrimination.…”
Interaural phase difference (IPD) discrimination upper frequency limits and just-noticeable differences (JNDs), interaural level difference (ILD) JNDs, and diotic intensity JNDs were measured for 20 older hearing-impaired listeners with matched moderate sloping to severe sensorineural hearing losses. The JNDs were measured using tone stimuli at 500 Hz. In addition to these auditory tests, the participants completed a cognitive test (Trail Making Test). Significant performance improvements in IPD discrimination were observed across test sessions. Strong correlations were found between IPD and ILD discrimination performance. Very strong correlations were observed between IPD discrimination and Trail Making performance as well as strong correlations between ILD discrimination and Trail Making performance. These relationships indicate that interindividual variability in IPD discrimination performance did not exclusively reflect deficits specific to any auditory processing, including early auditory processing of temporal information. The observed relationships between spatial audition and cognition may instead be attributable to a modality-general spatial processing deficit and/or individual differences in global processing speed.
“…Some studies have suggested that musical training is associated with improved speech perception in noise 1–3 , and that the benefit of musical training may protect against some of the deleterious effects of age on speech perception in noise 4 . However, although it is generally accepted that musical training is associated with improved skills relevant for music, such as pitch discrimination 5–9 , pitch interval discrimination 10,11 and rhythm discrimination 12,13 , its association with speech perception in noise and other challenging conditions remains disputed because of several failures to find such an effect 7,8,14,15 .…”
It remains unclear whether musical training is associated with improved speech understanding in a noisy environment, with different studies reaching differing conclusions. Even in those studies that have reported an advantage for highly trained musicians, it is not known whether the benefits measured in laboratory tests extend to more ecologically valid situations. This study aimed to establish whether musicians are better than non-musicians at understanding speech in a background of competing speakers or speech-shaped noise under more realistic conditions, involving sounds presented in space via a spherical array of 64 loudspeakers, rather than over headphones, with and without simulated room reverberation. The study also included experiments testing fundamental frequency discrimination limens (F0DLs), interaural time differences limens (ITDLs), and attentive tracking. Sixty-four participants (32 non-musicians and 32 musicians) were tested, with the two groups matched in age, sex, and IQ as assessed with Raven’s Advanced Progressive matrices. There was a significant benefit of musicianship for F0DLs, ITDLs, and attentive tracking. However, speech scores were not significantly different between the two groups. The results suggest no musician advantage for understanding speech in background noise or talkers under a variety of conditions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.