2006
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.510-511.1106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes on the Cycle Performance of Sulfur Electrode for Li/S Secondary Battery

Abstract: Lithium sulfur cells were prepared by composing with sulfur cathode, 0.5M LiCF3SO3 in tetra ethylene glycol dimethyl ether (TEGDME) solution and lithium anode. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) were used to form the high electric network and prevent the dissolution of lithium polysulfides in sulfur cathode. The effects of additive contents were investigated by discharge test. The morphology of cathode with MWNTs (20wt.%) has rough and submicro porous. The initial discharge capacity of lithium sulfur cell us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the use of porous silica, alumina, and mixed metal oxides leads to a low electrical conductivity of the cathode, which is unfavorable of hig-performance electrodes. In this sense, high-surface-area carbon nanotubes and nanofibers are better materials for the sulfur cathodes than the high-surface-area oxides. , Recent reports suggest that porous carbons are the most promising materials for the sulfur cathodes: the cathode made of sulfur on mesoporous carbon shows an excellent rate performance while retaining good cyclability of the cathode at low sulfur loading, however, results in a low energy density; the cathode made of sulfur on microporous carbon shows an excellent cyclability but compromises the rate performance …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of porous silica, alumina, and mixed metal oxides leads to a low electrical conductivity of the cathode, which is unfavorable of hig-performance electrodes. In this sense, high-surface-area carbon nanotubes and nanofibers are better materials for the sulfur cathodes than the high-surface-area oxides. , Recent reports suggest that porous carbons are the most promising materials for the sulfur cathodes: the cathode made of sulfur on mesoporous carbon shows an excellent rate performance while retaining good cyclability of the cathode at low sulfur loading, however, results in a low energy density; the cathode made of sulfur on microporous carbon shows an excellent cyclability but compromises the rate performance …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the MWNT was revealed as an excellent conducting material for lithium secondary batteries because of its effective electron conduction path and network structure [8][9][10]. The electrochemical property of the Li/S battery could be improved by partial substitution of MWNT for carbon [8,11,12]. However, there have been no reports regarding the Li/MoS 2 cell using carbon nanotubes as the conducting agent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the cathode material design, the use of conductive carbon materials, the design of nanostructured sulfur cathodes, and the incorporation of polar metal materials are the most common and widely used methods. Conductive carbon materials, such as carbon nanotubes [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ] and graphene [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ], can encapsulate polysulfides in the internal pores by physical adsorption [ 17 ]. However, the interaction between non-polar carbon materials and polar polysulfides is weak and cannot inhibit the diffusion of polysulfides in the long cycle process [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%