“…(6) explained that physical activity can cause brain plasticity, regulate psychological function, improve learning outcomes, and improve the memory. A study conducted by (7) also explained that coordination exercises improve the cognitive performance, this data of this study showed the improvement of attention, concentration, and fluid intelligence in children aged 9-12. The exercise involves complex motion patterns that can stimulate brain cells, especially in the hippocampus.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Life Kinetic training is an exercise that emphasizes the combination and coordination of physical activity, cognition challenges, and visual perceptions made through the motion patterns of throwing and catching objects These exercises have an effect on increasing cognitive abilities such as attention, spatial abilities, memory, and executive function (7), since this training can stimulate the growth of new cells in the brain so that it is positively correlated with memory (16).…”
__In Indonesia, Life Kinetic training in improving the cognitive function of football athletes is rarely limited. Therefore, football athletes are often not focused on doing their duties. Exercises in developing countries are more varied in leading to multi-tasking exercises through Life Kinetic training, then the performance of athletes especially in the function of cognition is better. This study involved 40 football athletes of UPI. Those 40 subject were divided into two groups which obtained the experimental group and the control group. The experimental group was given the Life Kinetic training, while the control group was given the treatment of conventional exercise. The instrument to measure the cognitive function used Concentration Grid Test and Advanced Progressive Matrices Test. The research design used a pretest-posttest control group design. The data analysis technique used Multivariate Test. The results of the study showed that there was a significant effect of Life Kinetic training on the improvement of cognitive functions especially in the concentration and intelligence of football athletes. There was a different effect of cognitive functions between athletes trained by Life Kinetic training and conventional training. Life Kinetic training is better than conventional training in improving the cognitive functions of football athletes.
“…(6) explained that physical activity can cause brain plasticity, regulate psychological function, improve learning outcomes, and improve the memory. A study conducted by (7) also explained that coordination exercises improve the cognitive performance, this data of this study showed the improvement of attention, concentration, and fluid intelligence in children aged 9-12. The exercise involves complex motion patterns that can stimulate brain cells, especially in the hippocampus.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Life Kinetic training is an exercise that emphasizes the combination and coordination of physical activity, cognition challenges, and visual perceptions made through the motion patterns of throwing and catching objects These exercises have an effect on increasing cognitive abilities such as attention, spatial abilities, memory, and executive function (7), since this training can stimulate the growth of new cells in the brain so that it is positively correlated with memory (16).…”
__In Indonesia, Life Kinetic training in improving the cognitive function of football athletes is rarely limited. Therefore, football athletes are often not focused on doing their duties. Exercises in developing countries are more varied in leading to multi-tasking exercises through Life Kinetic training, then the performance of athletes especially in the function of cognition is better. This study involved 40 football athletes of UPI. Those 40 subject were divided into two groups which obtained the experimental group and the control group. The experimental group was given the Life Kinetic training, while the control group was given the treatment of conventional exercise. The instrument to measure the cognitive function used Concentration Grid Test and Advanced Progressive Matrices Test. The research design used a pretest-posttest control group design. The data analysis technique used Multivariate Test. The results of the study showed that there was a significant effect of Life Kinetic training on the improvement of cognitive functions especially in the concentration and intelligence of football athletes. There was a different effect of cognitive functions between athletes trained by Life Kinetic training and conventional training. Life Kinetic training is better than conventional training in improving the cognitive functions of football athletes.
“…5 First hints indicate effects of the training on cognitive abilities like flexibility, inhibition, working memory, spatial ability, and fluid intelligence, in particular in sedentary young adults. 6 In contrast, the training induced no significant effect on cognition in physically active participants within the same study; but an improvement in coordinative performance was found in the same training group, which was larger than the one in the control group. 6 In studies on children and adolescent athletes, the training showed systematic improvements elicited by the neurocognitive training on eye–hand coordination 7 and football-specific dual task or coordination tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…6 In contrast, the training induced no significant effect on cognition in physically active participants within the same study; but an improvement in coordinative performance was found in the same training group, which was larger than the one in the control group. 6 In studies on children and adolescent athletes, the training showed systematic improvements elicited by the neurocognitive training on eye–hand coordination 7 and football-specific dual task or coordination tests. 8 If these findings can be transferred to adults is yet questionable.…”
Background: We aimed to investigate the potential effects of a 4-week motor–cognitive dual-task training on cognitive and motor function as well as exercise motivation in young, healthy, and active adults. Methods: A total of 26 participants (age 25 ± 2 years; 10 women) were randomly allocated to either the intervention group or a control group. The intervention group performed a motor–cognitive training (3×/week), while the participants of the control group received no intervention. Before and after the intervention period of 4 weeks, all participants underwent cognitive (d2-test, Trail Making Test) and motor (lower-body choice reaction test and time to stabilization test) assessments. Following each of the 12 workouts, self-reported assessments (rating of perceived exertion, enjoyment and pleasant anticipation of the next training session) were done. Analyses of covariances and 95% confidence intervals plotting for between group and time effects were performed. Results: Data from 24 participants were analysed. No pre- to post-intervention improvement nor a between-group difference regarding motor outcomes (choice-reaction: F = 0.5; time to stabilization test: F = 0.7; p > 0.05) occurred. No significant training-induced changes were found in the cognitive tests (D2: F = 0.02; Trail Making Test A: F = 0.24; Trail Making Test B: F = 0.002; p > 0.05). Both enjoyment and anticipation of the next workout were rated as high. Discussion: The neuro-motor training appears to have no significant effects on motor and cognitive function in healthy, young and physically active adults. This might be explained in part by the participants’ very high motor and cognitive abilities, the comparably low training intensity or the programme duration. The high degree of exercise enjoyment, however, may qualify the training as a facilitator to initiate and maintain regular physical activity. The moderate to vigorous intensity levels further point towards potential health-enhancing cardiorespiratory effects.
“…Hinsichtlich der Verbesserungen des Kontrollprogramms decken sich die vorliegenden Ergebnisse mit den von Chu et al (2014) berichteten Effekten der Yoga Übungen. Johann et al 2016, Demirakca et al 2016, Niederer et al 2018 oder Jonglage-Übungen mit ein und können mit den Ergebnissen der vorliegenden Studie verglichen werden (Draganski 2004, Scholz 2009 (Chang und Etnier, 2009).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.