2014
DOI: 10.1002/pam.21809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Monitoring on Mortgage Delinquency: Evidence From a Randomized Field Study

Abstract: In the wake of the housing crisis in 2008, U.S. policymakers have developed a range of policy proposals to address the risk of mortgage borrowers going into payment default. Some of these proposed regulations would effectively eliminate certain loans with riskier borrower characteristics from the market. Such prescriptive approaches fail to recognize alternatives that permit riskier loans to be made, but require postorigination practices designed to offset elevated default risk by improving the capability of i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis also unveiled studies that not only deal with cognitive biases in behaviors and judgments but also incorporate key tenets of nudging theory. These studies cover a variety of public decision domains, including improving attitudes toward government trustworthiness (Grimmelikhuijsen and Meijer 2012), increasing the collection of delinquent fines (Haynes et al 2013), boosting organ donations (Moseley and Stoker 2015), reducing the likelihood that home buyers become delinquent or default on their mortgages (Moulton et al 2015), and encouraging the adoption of desired health behaviors (Vlaev et al 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis also unveiled studies that not only deal with cognitive biases in behaviors and judgments but also incorporate key tenets of nudging theory. These studies cover a variety of public decision domains, including improving attitudes toward government trustworthiness (Grimmelikhuijsen and Meijer 2012), increasing the collection of delinquent fines (Haynes et al 2013), boosting organ donations (Moseley and Stoker 2015), reducing the likelihood that home buyers become delinquent or default on their mortgages (Moulton et al 2015), and encouraging the adoption of desired health behaviors (Vlaev et al 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some credit counseling agencies follow‐up with consumers at set intervals postcounseling to check on their progress toward their financial goals (Wang )—a form of financial coaching (Collins and O'Rourke ). There is an evolving body of literature that finds that financial coaching leads to improved consumer behaviors, including reduced debt levels and more timely debt payments (Collins ; Collins and O'Rourke ; Moulton et al ; Theodos et al ).…”
Section: Background and Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an evolving body of literature that finds that financial coaching leads to improved consumer behaviors, including reduced debt levels and more timely debt payments (Collins 2013;Collins and O'Rourke 2012;Moulton et al 2015;Theodos et al 2015).…”
Section: Background and Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a financial education workshop and personalized coaching resulted in a higher likelihood of paying credit cards on time-despite a take-up rate of less than one percent (Lara Ibarra, McKenzie, & Ruiz Ortega, 2017). Another randomized field experiment that assigned 295 first-time homebuyers to receive an online financial planning module and quarterly financial coaching found a 20 percent reduction in mortgage delinquency, although only 36 percent participated in the coaching (Moulton et al, 2015). Finally, a study of two community-based programs, each with roughly 200-250 individuals assigned to treatment, exhibited take-up rates of one-third to onehalf.…”
Section: What Do We Already Know About Financial Education Programs?mentioning
confidence: 99%