2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of modality and repetition in a continuous recognition memory task: Repetition has no effect on auditory recognition memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to visual memory, memory for auditory stimuli appears to be inferior (Cohen et al, 2009; see also Kassim et al, 2018); however, recent work from our group has demonstrated that information from both modalities interacts during the formation of long-term memory representations (Meyerhoff & Huff, 2016). In this study, the participants studied brief auditory, visual, or audio-visual tracks from movies.…”
Section: Auditory and Visual Information In Long-term Memorymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Compared to visual memory, memory for auditory stimuli appears to be inferior (Cohen et al, 2009; see also Kassim et al, 2018); however, recent work from our group has demonstrated that information from both modalities interacts during the formation of long-term memory representations (Meyerhoff & Huff, 2016). In this study, the participants studied brief auditory, visual, or audio-visual tracks from movies.…”
Section: Auditory and Visual Information In Long-term Memorymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Changes to neural oscillations can improve multi-tasking performance (Hsu et al, 2017) Basic Cognitive Science Research that generates causal models to explain a phenomenon of interest (Sussman et al, 2006) Repetition improves performance in visual and cross-modal, but not auditory, recognition tasks (Amir Kassim et al, 2018).…”
Section: Scholarly Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike conventional approaches, which basically target learners' performance and achievement, most recent studies have endeavored to employ neurocognitive tasks to get more reliable results. By virtue of this objective inspection, a few studies documented that repetition may have no effect (e.g., Amir Kassim et al, 2018) or even a negative effect (e.g., Peterson and Mulligan, 2012;Mulligan and Peterson, 2013) on human memory. As for one, Amir Kassim et al (2018) deduced that, unlike visual and a combination of auditory and visual repetitions, two auditory repetitions have no effect on the participants' recognition memory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By virtue of this objective inspection, a few studies documented that repetition may have no effect (e.g., Amir Kassim et al, 2018) or even a negative effect (e.g., Peterson and Mulligan, 2012;Mulligan and Peterson, 2013) on human memory. As for one, Amir Kassim et al (2018) deduced that, unlike visual and a combination of auditory and visual repetitions, two auditory repetitions have no effect on the participants' recognition memory. Not only that, Peterson and Mulligan (2012) reported a negative repetition effect for the participants who went through a list of cue-target pairs twice compared to those who studied the pairs once only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%