Effects of Mobilization With Movement on Pain and Range of Motion in Patients With Unilateral Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Delgado-Gil, José A.; Prado-Robles, Eva; Rodrigues-de-Souza, Daiana Priscila; Cleland, Joshua A.; Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, César; Alburquerque‐Sendín, Francisco

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.12.008

Cited by 45 publications

(40 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Delgado-Gil 2015 54 High Three acceptable-quality SRs evaluated conservative treatments for AC. One reviewed 12 RCTs involving 810 patients.…”

Section: Manual Therapymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, in all 3 of these, only 1 SMT session was included and only short-term effects on pain were measured, with patients whose mean age was in the early 30s. [58][59][60] Only 1 of these trials 54 reported on adverse events, and in that case, there were none.…”

Section: Shoulder Impingement Syndromementioning

confidence: 99%

“…One trial found a statistically significant difference between the treatment and comparison groups. 54 In that study, the type of MT was MWM, and it was compared with a sham manual contact. Pain intensity was significantly improved in the MT group, compared with the sham, in a sample of 42 patients in their mid-50s with SIS of greater than 3 months' duration.…”

Section: Shoulder Impingement Syndromementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Systematic Review of Nondrug, Nonsurgical Treatment of Shoulder Conditions

Hawk

Minkalis

Khorsan

et al. 2017

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The purpose of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of conservative nondrug, nonsurgical interventions, either alone or in combination, for conditions of the shoulder. Methods: The review was conducted from March 2016 to November 2016 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), and was registered with PROSPERO. Eligibility criteria included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, or meta-analyses studying adult patients with a shoulder diagnosis. Interventions qualified if they did not involve prescription medication or surgical procedures, although these could be used in the comparison group or groups. At least 2 independent reviewers assessed the quality of each study using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network checklists. Shoulder conditions addressed were shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS), rotator cuff-associated disorders (RCs), adhesive capsulitis (AC), and nonspecific shoulder pain. Results: Twenty-five systematic reviews and 44 RCTs met inclusion criteria. Low-to moderate-quality evidence supported the use of manual therapies for all 4 shoulder conditions. Exercise, particularly combined with physical therapy protocols, was beneficial for SIS and AC. For SIS, moderate evidence supported several passive modalities. For RC, physical therapy protocols were found beneficial but not superior to surgery in the long term. Moderate evidence supported extracorporeal shockwave therapy for calcific tendinitis RC. Low-level laser was the only modality for which there was moderate evidence supporting its use for all 4 conditions. Conclusion: The findings of this literature review may help inform practitioners who use conservative methods (eg, doctors of chiropractic, physical therapists, and other manual therapists) regarding the levels of evidence for modalities used for common shoulder conditions. (J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2017;40:293-319)

show abstract

“…Delgado-Gil 2015 54 High Three acceptable-quality SRs evaluated conservative treatments for AC. One reviewed 12 RCTs involving 810 patients.…”

Section: Manual Therapymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Shoulder Impingement Syndromementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Shoulder Impingement Syndromementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Systematic Review of Nondrug, Nonsurgical Treatment of Shoulder Conditions

Hawk

Minkalis

Khorsan

et al. 2017

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…3 Many treatments for shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) are available in clinical practice. [4][5][6][7][8] Combined treatments composed of exercise and other therapies tended to yield better effects than single-intervention therapies.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…4,5 Manual therapy directed at the thoracic spine, as a standard treatment or combined with exercise, has been reported to improve pain and disability and increase global rating scale change for SIS. [6][7][8][9] However, the mechanisms by which thoracic spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) improves pain and shoulder motion have not been established.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Preliminary Randomized Clinical Trial on the Effect of Cervicothoracic Manipulation Plus Supervised Exercises vs a Home Exercise Program for the Treatment of Shoulder Impingement

Vinuesa-Montoya

Aguilar‐Ferrándiz

Matarán-Peñarrocha

et al. 2017

Journal of Chiropractic Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in pain, disability, and range of movement after cervicothoracic manipulation plus exercise therapy in individuals with unilateral shoulder impingement syndrome. Methods: Forty-one patients (30 men, 11 women; aged 47 ± 9) diagnosed with unilateral shoulder impingement syndrome attended 10 sessions for 5 weeks (2 sessions/wk). Eligible patients were randomly allocated to 2 study groups: cervicothoracic manipulation plus exercise therapy (n = 21) or home exercise program (n = 20). The outcomes measures included the visual analog scale (VAS); the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score; Shoulder Disability Questionnaire; subacromial impingement syndrome (Hawkins-Kennedy Test and Neer Test); and shoulder active range of motion (movements of flexion, extension, rotation, adduction, and abduction). Assessments were applied at baseline and 24 hours after completing 5 weeks of related interventions. Results: After 5 weeks of treatment significant between-group differences were observed in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (P = .012); however, no statistically significant differences were achieved for Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (P = .061) and pain intensity (P = .859). Both groups improved with regard to disability and clinical tests for detecting subacromial impingement syndrome. Conclusions: This clinical trial suggests that cervicothoracic manipulative treatment with mobilization plus exercise therapy may improve intensity of pain and range of motion compared with the home exercise group alone; the home exercise group had significant changes for flexion, extension, adduction, and abduction, but not for external and internal rotation movement in patients with shoulder impingement. (J Chiropr Med 2017;16:85-93)

show abstract

Manual Therapy and Pain in the Rehabilitation Patient

Mulcahy

2017

Comprehensive Pain Management in the Rehabilitation Patient

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Effects of Mobilization With Movement on Pain and Range of Motion in Patients With Unilateral Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Cited by 45 publications

References 26 publications

Systematic Review of Nondrug, Nonsurgical Treatment of Shoulder Conditions

Systematic Review of Nondrug, Nonsurgical Treatment of Shoulder Conditions

A Preliminary Randomized Clinical Trial on the Effect of Cervicothoracic Manipulation Plus Supervised Exercises vs a Home Exercise Program for the Treatment of Shoulder Impingement

Manual Therapy and Pain in the Rehabilitation Patient

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About