2006
DOI: 10.3750/aip2006.36.1.07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of mixed feeding schedules on growth performance, body composition, and nitrogen- and phosphorus balance in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is likely, once again, a result of shi drum's poor lipid utilization capability and preference to use protein as energy source. Despite the existence of similar results to ours in the literature such as for European sea bass (Lemarié et al 1998), N retention of shi drum seems to be much lower than many species including trout (Sevgili et al 2006), common carp (Cyprinus carpio, Jahan et al 2003), sea bream, common dentex (Dentex dentex), and sea bass (Company et al 1999). Accordingly, the N losses were higher in fish when fed 16L and 19L and these values are much higher than those previously published for different species (Hall et al 1990;Jahan et al 2003;Sevgili et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…This is likely, once again, a result of shi drum's poor lipid utilization capability and preference to use protein as energy source. Despite the existence of similar results to ours in the literature such as for European sea bass (Lemarié et al 1998), N retention of shi drum seems to be much lower than many species including trout (Sevgili et al 2006), common carp (Cyprinus carpio, Jahan et al 2003), sea bream, common dentex (Dentex dentex), and sea bass (Company et al 1999). Accordingly, the N losses were higher in fish when fed 16L and 19L and these values are much higher than those previously published for different species (Hall et al 1990;Jahan et al 2003;Sevgili et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…Alternating feeding regimes of P deficient and P-sufficient diets may help meet this goal; the results of the present feeding trial clearly demonstrate that the growth performance of a P-deficient (P04) alternating with an optimal level of P diet (P06) comparable with a P-sufficient diet (P08) and P06 continuously. Earlier studies on trout (Sevgili et al 2006), carp and common carp Nandeesha et al 1994), tilapia (Patel and Yakupitiyage 2003) using mixed feeding schedules in which low-and high-protein-based diets were fed in an alternating fashion resulted in higher growth and this was considered as a possible way of reducing feed cost and nitrogen waste from aquaculture operation. It is interesting to note that after 56 days the visual growth depletion (not statistically) in fish fed continuously with P04 (P-deficient diet) was noticed, this is likely due to the fact that fish have tissue reserves P and until that period they could draw upon these reserves, as dietary P intake was insufficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach of alternating phosphorus deficient and sufficient diets has the potential to reduce P excretion without loss in production (Hardy et al 1993), however this approach has not been evaluated using practical ingredients. Fish on alternating protein feeding schedule (i.e., high-protein feed alternating with low-protein feed) exhibited growth performance, reduced significantly nitrogen loading and reduced feed cost in many studies (De Silva 1989;De Silva et al 1993;De Silva 2006;Sevgili et al 2006). This study was therefore aimed to test the validity of the alternate feeding regimes of P deficient diets and optimum P level in reducing P loading from rainbow trout.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because protein digestibility varies on a day‐to‐day basis in a certain rhythmic manner in Nile tilapia ( Orechromius niloticus ) (De Silva & Perera 1984). Application of mixed protein schedules to reduce feed cost and improve nutrient utilization has been demonstrated for Indian carp ( Labeo rohita ) (Nandeesha, Silva & Krishna 1993; Nandeesha, De Silva, Krishnamurthy & Dathatri 1994), common carp ( Cyprinus carpio ) under pond culture systems (Nandeesha, De Silva & Krishnamurthy 1995; Nandeesha, Gangadhara & Manissery 2002), Nile tilapia ( O. niloticus ) (Santiago & Laron 2002; Patel & Yakupitiyage 2003; Bolivar, Jimenez & Brown 2006), Channa striata (Hashim 1994), sutchi catfish, silver carp ( Hypopthalmichthys molitrix ) (Ali, Hossain & Mazid 2005) and trout ( Oncorhynchus Mykiss ) (Sevgili, Emre, Kanyilmaz, Diler & Hossu 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%