2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.106986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of mineralogy on pore structure and fluid flow capacity of deeply buried sandstone reservoirs with a case study in the Junggar Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the permeability of 83.3% samples is less than 1 mD. Tight sandstone reservoirs are generally low-porosity and low-permeability reservoirs which are not conducive to oilfield development. ,, …”
Section: Characteristics and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, the permeability of 83.3% samples is less than 1 mD. Tight sandstone reservoirs are generally low-porosity and low-permeability reservoirs which are not conducive to oilfield development. ,, …”
Section: Characteristics and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…According to the principle of pore radius calculation of NMR, the relaxation time, relaxation rate, and rock specific surface area are related. , The relationship between the relaxation time and pore radius is as follows where ρ is the surface relaxivity, S is the cores surface area, and V is the cores volume. The relationship between the radius and surface area is established by the ratio of surface area to volume. where F s is the shape factor.…”
Section: Characteristics and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations