2013
DOI: 10.1089/ast.2013.0986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Microgravity on the Virulence of Listeria monocytogenes, Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans, and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Abstract: To evaluate effects of microgravity on virulence, we studied the ability of four common clinical pathogens--Listeria monocytogenes, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Enterococcus faecalis, and Candida albicans--to kill wild type Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) nematodes at the larval and adult stages. Simultaneous studies were performed utilizing spaceflight, clinorotation in a 2-D clinorotation device, and static ground controls. The feeding rate of worms for killed E. coli was unaffecte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a virulence study by Hammond et al (2013), 3 bonafide bacterial pathogens, Listeria monocytogenes , methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and Enterococcus faecalis , were exposed to spaceflight (actual microgravity) or LSMMG (generated using a clinostat) and compared to ground normal gravity (NG) controls in their ability to kill larval and adult wild type Caenorhabditis elegans ( C. elegans ). Nematodes and pathogens were mixed and then co-cultured for 48 hours during which bacterial virulence was measured by evaluating nematode mortality.…”
Section: Spaceflight Experiments and Their Inherent Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In a virulence study by Hammond et al (2013), 3 bonafide bacterial pathogens, Listeria monocytogenes , methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and Enterococcus faecalis , were exposed to spaceflight (actual microgravity) or LSMMG (generated using a clinostat) and compared to ground normal gravity (NG) controls in their ability to kill larval and adult wild type Caenorhabditis elegans ( C. elegans ). Nematodes and pathogens were mixed and then co-cultured for 48 hours during which bacterial virulence was measured by evaluating nematode mortality.…”
Section: Spaceflight Experiments and Their Inherent Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, this was the first experiment that assayed virulence of bacterial pathogens in space (true microgravity environment). Interestingly, when the group characterized the LSMMG effect, the decrease in the virulence of all 3 pathogens was less pronounced, but the general trend of no observed hyperviruelnce was maintained (Hammond et al 2013). Despite this study advancing the field of space microbiology by employing a spaceflight (true microgravity) infection system, most virulence studies employing C. elegans involve excessive biofilm production resulting in starvation and or GI infections (Balla and Troemel 2013).…”
Section: Spaceflight Experiments and Their Inherent Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Humans are by no means sterile when they travel into orbit, they carry with them a microbiome teeming with life that, in the case of the ISS, interacts with and contributes to the environmental microbiome that has established and built up over the past 16 years. Early surveys of microbial taxa found on the ISS have revealed, perhaps unsurprisingly, that the collective microbial community on the station is likely to not be dissimilar to built environments found on Earth, although microgravity does alter the growth dynamics and physiological properties of some species [2][3][4] . However, despite some foundational work, our understanding of the impact of prolonged exposure to microgravity on microbial physiology, and in particular the effects on the human microbiome and how human-microorganism interactions change over time, remains extremely limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%