2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of microbial community succession on volatile profiles and biogenic amine during sufu fermentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these results, we speculate the significant difference of ethanol concentration between red and WS came from the of the dressing mixture. In addition to ethanol, ester compounds (e.g., ethyl acetic acid, ethyl hexanoate, and ethyl caprylate) were also predominant in sufu, similar to the results of previous studies (Chung et al, 2005;Xie et al, 2018;Liang et al, 2019). These compounds are characterized by fruit-like and floral aromas, which are formed mainly by the esterification of alcohols and organic acids (Erten et al, 2007), and by the contribution of microbial activity during the fermentation and storage period (Wang et al, 2015b).…”
Section: Physicochemical Differences Between Rs and Wssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on these results, we speculate the significant difference of ethanol concentration between red and WS came from the of the dressing mixture. In addition to ethanol, ester compounds (e.g., ethyl acetic acid, ethyl hexanoate, and ethyl caprylate) were also predominant in sufu, similar to the results of previous studies (Chung et al, 2005;Xie et al, 2018;Liang et al, 2019). These compounds are characterized by fruit-like and floral aromas, which are formed mainly by the esterification of alcohols and organic acids (Erten et al, 2007), and by the contribution of microbial activity during the fermentation and storage period (Wang et al, 2015b).…”
Section: Physicochemical Differences Between Rs and Wssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In contrast, Acinetobacter (10.92% ± 4.24%), Lactococcus (9.31% ± 2.20%), Pseudomonas (9.04% ± 5.88%), Tetragenococcus (8.31% ± 1.78%), Lactobacillus (7.08% ± 3.49%), and Chryseobacterium (5.89% ± 3.54%) were the predominant genera in WS samples (Figure 3). Previous reports have shown that Lactococcus, Acinetobacter, Tetragenococcus, Pseudomonas, and Lactobacillus are the dominant bacteria and crucial contributors during the production of fermented foods, such as cheese, sufu, soy sauce, liquor, tea, and vinegar (Tanaka et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2016;Gu et al, 2018;Huang et al, 2018;Liang et al, 2019;Liu and Qiao, 2019). At the phylum level, the relative abundances of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were significantly different between these two types of sufu samples (P < 0.01; Figure 3).…”
Section: Differences In Bacterial Communities Between Rs and Wsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The salt concentration in all gochujang samples decreased after fermentation. Similar to other fermented foods, it is presumed that the salt concentration decreased due to the release of water by osmosis of the ingredients (Lee et al, 2017 ; Liang et al, 2019 ). They were ~8.2 and 7.3%, before and after fermentation, respectively ( Figure 1B ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenylethyl alcohol has a pleasant sweet taste and flowery aroma, and is widely presented in soy sauce [25] and sufu. [26] Ethanol can polymerize with organic acids that form the main flavor compounds of fermented food. Among 10 acid compounds identified, 2-methyl-hexanoic acid was a major volatile, comprising approximately 79% of the total quantified acids in the final sufu samples and widely distributed in reported commercial fermentation starters.…”
Section: Analysis Of Volatile Compounds During the Sufu Fermentationmentioning
confidence: 99%