2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.01913.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of microalgal diets on larval growth and survival of Paphia malabarica chemnitz

Abstract: The e¡ects of food availability on the larval growth and survival of Paphia malabarica were studied in two experiments by feeding the larvae with six algal diets. Newly hatched larvae of P. malabarica were fed with six di¡erent marine microalgae species, singly and in a combination of two species. The best growth was with Isochrysis galbana and Nannochloropsis salina as a single species of diet. The nutritional value of single-species diets was in the order of N. salina, I. galbana, Dicrateria inornata, Chaeto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comprehensive information on larval food supply is not available for the MAB; hence the model was run under the assumption that food supply did not limit larval growth. Larvae are variously affected by periods of suboptimal food (e.g., Moran and Manahan, 2004;Powell et al, 2002;Przeslawski and Webb, 2009) and this can influence survival and location of settlement because larval growth frequently may be food-limited (Bos et al, 2006;Gireesh and Gopinathan, 2008;Olson and Olson, 1989). Thus, our simulations under this assumption represent results under optimal food conditions in the MAB.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive information on larval food supply is not available for the MAB; hence the model was run under the assumption that food supply did not limit larval growth. Larvae are variously affected by periods of suboptimal food (e.g., Moran and Manahan, 2004;Powell et al, 2002;Przeslawski and Webb, 2009) and this can influence survival and location of settlement because larval growth frequently may be food-limited (Bos et al, 2006;Gireesh and Gopinathan, 2008;Olson and Olson, 1989). Thus, our simulations under this assumption represent results under optimal food conditions in the MAB.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Survival values after 10 days (pediveliger stage) are satisfactory and comparable to other reports on bivalve larviculture, like in Mu. edulis (Oliva et al, 2014), Paphia malabarica (Gireesh & Gopinathan, 2008), Clinocardium nuttallii (Liu et al, 2009), and Pa. generosa (Liu, Pearce, McKinley, & Forster, 2016). Further research is needed to investigate possibilities of other microalgal combinations and preferential ingestion of different algae by Pacific clam at different developmental stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stocking density, quantity, and nutritional quality of the diet are among the most significant biotic factors to be considered in larviculture, they are closely related to growth and survival and are relatively easy to manipulate (Gireesh & Gopinathan, 2008; Goldberg, 1989; Riisgard, 1988). The influence of stocking density on larval growth and survival has been evaluated in several clam species (Liu, Gurney‐Smith, Beerens, & Pearce, 2010; Yan, Zhang, & Yang, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%