2004
DOI: 10.1029/2003gl018644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of metamorphic crustal densification on earthquake size in warm slabs

Abstract: [1] Some recent damaging earthquakes occurred in the lower crust or mantle of warm subducting slabs. They are consistent with a theoretical prediction that larger events tend to be deeper inside the slab as a result of mechanical damage to the crust caused by metamorphic rock densification. The densification begins in a thin layer along the slab surface, inducing a stretching force in it. Fracture spacing scales with layer thickness, resulting in a ''shattered'' upper crust in which earthquake ruptures have li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(15 reference statements)
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This supports our tomographic interpretation that dehydration embrittlement might have induced the 26 May 2003 Miyagi-oki main shock and its aftershocks. We infer from our results that large and damaging intra-slab earthquakes may be driven by tectonic forces but facilitated by local dehydration embrittlement, which is consistent with the recent study made by Wang et al [2004].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This supports our tomographic interpretation that dehydration embrittlement might have induced the 26 May 2003 Miyagi-oki main shock and its aftershocks. We infer from our results that large and damaging intra-slab earthquakes may be driven by tectonic forces but facilitated by local dehydration embrittlement, which is consistent with the recent study made by Wang et al [2004].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This observation indicates that the downdip extent of LFEs in this region is not governed by the crust‐to‐mantle transition in the overriding plate. The vertical separation of LFEs and intraslab events suggests that the LVZ, interpreted here as upper oceanic crust, cannot support regular earthquakes perhaps owing to low shear strength induced by metamorphic dehydration and high pore fluid pressures, and that intraslab seismicity is concentrated within more competent gabbroic and ultramafic material in the lower oceanic crust and upper mantle of the subducting plate [ Wang et al , 2004]. In this context, the increased proximity of LFEs and intraslab events near the downdip limit of LFEs (and prominent LVZ) on profile B–B′ could be explained as due to a transition to diminished pore fluid pressures and porosity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large spatial dimension and short recurrence of slow slip also requires near-lithostatic pore pressure in rate-and-state friction models Rice, 2005, 2007], consistent with conditions for the onset of low-pressure metamorphic dehydration reactions [Fyfe et al, 1978]. Near-lithostatic pore fluid pressure implies a low-permeability plate boundary, where the sealing agents can be a combination of grain size reduction on the fault [Caine et al, 1996] possibly caused by shattering of upper crust [Wang et al, 2004a], and the precipitation of minerals during fluid flow [Kato et al, 2003;Meneghini and Moore, 2007].…”
Section: Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[29] As mentioned above, precisely relocated intraslab earthquakes in northern Cascadia locally cluster within two parallel bands of shallow seismic activity separated by 2-3 km, at depths of 40-60 km, upon which they merge into one seismic zone and taper out horizontally at ∼60 km [Cassidy and Waldhauser, 2003]. We note that about 12%-15% of small magnitude (M < 3) events are located above the slab surface as defined by the deep slab model [Wang et al, 2004a], mostly at depths of 55-65 km [Cassidy and Waldhauser, 2003]. In a separate study in the Puget Sound region, Preston et al [2003] located intraslab earthquakes within a single, dipping plane of relatively uniform seismicity at depths of 30-70 km.…”
Section: Intraslab Earthquakesmentioning
confidence: 99%