Effects of Message Framing and Visual-Fear Appeals on Smoker Responses to Antismoking Ads

Kang, Jungsuk; Lin, Carolyn A.

doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1012242

Cited by 24 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Unlike this finding, the visualization of the assignment does not affect the framing bias (Gamliel and Kreiner, 2013). On the other hand, Park and Rothrock's (2006) visualisation effect contradicts the results of Kang and Lin's (2015) experiments with smokers. These authors find that images of healthy and cancer-affected lungs do not have an impact on smokers because the high-risk option (to keep smoking) is too important to them.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 83%

“…Indeed, numerous authors show that this group of factors considerably affects the decision in term of the framing effect. Kang and Lin (2015), for example, test the impact of a positive/negative framing in a message that mentions the harmful impacts of smoking on health. They find that framing has no effect on reactions of people who are smoking.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Framing and Bias: A Literature Review of Recent Findings

Beratšová

Krchová

Gažová

et al. 2018

CEJM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Framing bias is an individual decision-making misconception caused by the fact that a person interprets the surrounding world according to a decision frame chosen by her or his subjective opinion. This article aims to review various kinds of factors that cause and affect framing or lead to debiasing, i.e. a decrease in the resulting framing bias. The objective of the study is carried out using a literature review that analyzes recent empirical studies. As a result, numerous factors are identified that according to the studies have an impact on framing. It transpires that four broader groups of these factors can be established -decision situation setup (amount of information, additional presentation of options), experience (knowledge, engagement), effort (attention, complexity, the amount of information to process) and demographics (gender, nationality).

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 83%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Framing and Bias: A Literature Review of Recent Findings

Beratšová

Krchová

Gažová

et al. 2018

CEJM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This criterion was imposed to examine relative effectiveness or ineffectiveness of visual image on persuasion compared to non-image message. Studies that compared different type of visual images (e.g., McQuarrie & Mick, 1999;van Rompay, de Vries, & van Venrooij, 2010), intensity of image descriptions (e.g., Kang & Lin, 2015;Verlhiac, Chappé, & Meyer, 2011), or a visual treatment group with a control group of no message recipients (e.g., Marshall, Craun, & Theriot, 2009) were excluded from the main analysis. Third, the dependent variable must be persuasion, assessed by attitude change, behavioral intention, perceived effectiveness, behavioral change, or a combination of thereof.…”

Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2020

AJMMC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

All ATINER"s publications including its e-journals are open access without any costs (submission, processing, publishing, open access paid by authors, open access paid by readers etc.) and is independent of presentations at any of the many small events (conferences, symposiums, forums, colloquiums, courses, roundtable discussions) organized by ATINER throughout the year and entail significant costs of participating. The intellectual property rights of the submitting papers remain with the author. Before you submit, please make sure your paper meets the basic academic standards, which includes proper English. Some articles will be selected from the numerous papers that have been presented at the various annual international academic conferences organized by the different divisions and units of the Athens Institute for Education and Research. The plethora of papers presented every year will enable the editorial board of each journal to select the best, and in so doing produce a top-quality academic journal. In addition to papers presented, ATINER will encourage the independent submission of papers to be evaluated for publication. The current issue is the third of the sixth volume of the Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications (AJMMC), published by the Mass Media & Communication Unit of ATINER .

show abstract

“…Motivational interviewing, message framing, and empowerment techniques have also been shown to be effective to induce behavioral modification and resilience for individuals with HIV or substance use disorders. [42][43][44][45] Although data are lacking on whether strengthening agency for individuals living with HIV can enhance retention, self-determination and self-efficacy theory have been successfully integrated into strategies to improve physical activity for individuals living with cardiac disease. 46 Our findings suggest that such approaches might likewise be applied effectively to address barriers to retention in HIV care.…”

Section: Insights From Behavioral Psychologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Pathways to Retention in HIV Care Among U.S. Veterans

Hennink

Kaiser

Marconi

2018

AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Retaining HIV patients in clinical care is a critical component of the HIV care continuum, impacting not only patients' virologic suppression, but their overall health and wellbeing. Understanding reasons for patient drop-out is therefore important to improve HIV outcomes and reduce transmission. This study used qualitative in-depth interviews with patients who dropped out of HIV care (n = 16) from the Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, to explore their reasons for drop-out and how they negotiate barriers to return to care. Results show three interlinked "pathways" leading to patient drop-out -wellness, illness, and medication pathways. These pathways encompass both barriers to retention and triggers to resume clinic visits, with patients following different pathways at different times in their lives. Perhaps the strongest deterrent to continuing clinic visits was participants' self-perception of wellness, which often outweighed clinical indicators of wellness. These pathways suggest that multiple approaches are needed to improve treatment retention, including reducing clinic-based barriers, addressing basic needs that are barriers to clinic visits, and empowering patients to view clinic visits as a facilitator to maintaining their overall health rather than only a reaction to illness.

show abstract

Effects of Message Framing and Visual-Fear Appeals on Smoker Responses to Antismoking Ads

Cited by 24 publications

References 45 publications

Framing and Bias: A Literature Review of Recent Findings

Framing and Bias: A Literature Review of Recent Findings

Untitled

Pathways to Retention in HIV Care Among U.S. Veterans

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About