2015
DOI: 10.1134/s0362119715020176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of mechanical stimulation of sole support zones on the H-reflex characteristics under conditions of support unloading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A decrease of transverse stiffness in m.soleus in this group reached significance only by the 6th day of DI; at the same time decrease of EMG amplitude at rest and maximal isokinetic force of m.triceps surae as well as signs of hyperreflexia and changes in MU recruitment order were not registered at all (Grigoriev et al, 2004; Khusnutdinova et al, 2004; Miller et al, 2004, 2005, 2010; Netreba et al, 2004, 2005, 2006; Kozlovskaya et al, 2007a,b; Shigueva et al, 2015a; Zakirova et al, 2015). Analogous effects of mechanical stimulation of the soles support zones were demonstrated in the structure of the muscular apparatus: no decrease of myofibrils’ sensitivity to free calcium ions, which is regularly observed under conditions of gravitational unloading; no changes in the cross sectional area of muscle fibers; and no decrease of the number of fibers containing slow isoforms of heavy myosin chains (Grigoriev et al, 2004; Moukhina et al, 2004; Shenkman et al, 2004a,b).…”
Section: Does Support Withdrawal Triggers Hypogravitational Motor Synmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A decrease of transverse stiffness in m.soleus in this group reached significance only by the 6th day of DI; at the same time decrease of EMG amplitude at rest and maximal isokinetic force of m.triceps surae as well as signs of hyperreflexia and changes in MU recruitment order were not registered at all (Grigoriev et al, 2004; Khusnutdinova et al, 2004; Miller et al, 2004, 2005, 2010; Netreba et al, 2004, 2005, 2006; Kozlovskaya et al, 2007a,b; Shigueva et al, 2015a; Zakirova et al, 2015). Analogous effects of mechanical stimulation of the soles support zones were demonstrated in the structure of the muscular apparatus: no decrease of myofibrils’ sensitivity to free calcium ions, which is regularly observed under conditions of gravitational unloading; no changes in the cross sectional area of muscle fibers; and no decrease of the number of fibers containing slow isoforms of heavy myosin chains (Grigoriev et al, 2004; Moukhina et al, 2004; Shenkman et al, 2004a,b).…”
Section: Does Support Withdrawal Triggers Hypogravitational Motor Synmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The sensitivity to proprioceptive signals was also changed: exposure to DI was associated with the development of H-reflex system hypersensitivity, which was demonstrated by a decrease of the soleus H-reflex thresholds and an increase of relative H-reflex amplitudes (Kozlovskaya et al, 2007a; Saenko, 2007; Zakirova et al, 2015).…”
Section: Effects On the Sensory-motor Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that changes in the work of the CNS under conditions of support unloading may be the cause of a decrease in inhibitory effects on spinal reflexes, however, this statement remains the subject of discussion. The phenomenon of spinal hyperreflexia is observed both after SF ( Reschke et al, 1984b ; Kozlovskaya et al, 1988 ; Grigoriev and Ushakov, 2013 ) and after DI ( Zakirova et al, 2015 ; Acket et al, 2018 ). A recent study of the excitability of the motor neuron pool in the soleus and gastrocnemius muscles in terms of values of the thresholds and amplitudes of the motor response to transcranial and transspinal magnetic stimulation after DI confirms the spinal nature of the development of hypogravitational hyperreflexia.…”
Section: Dry Immersionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigators found that mechanical stimulation via pressurized boots restores neuromuscular activation throughout the entirety of the lower limb musculature and leads to preserved lower limb strength and locomotor function (Layne and Forth, 2008). Similar effects of mechanical stimulation have been demonstrated during DI (Ogneva et al, 2011;Zakirova et al, 2015). Importantly, the prevention of DI-induced structural and functional changes in soleus fibers were observed only with mechanical foot stimulation and not with electrical muscle stimulation, suggesting that tactile input is more important than contractile activity for protection against gravitational unloading.…”
Section: Tactile Inputmentioning
confidence: 92%