2014
DOI: 10.5849/forsci.12-164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Measurement Errors on Individual Tree Stem Volume Estimates for the Austrian National Forest Inventory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
68
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
68
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All NFI data were considered to be ground truth. Especially for small-scale predictions, as in this study, however, these errors could increase the variances of the predictions and introduce a bias [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…All NFI data were considered to be ground truth. Especially for small-scale predictions, as in this study, however, these errors could increase the variances of the predictions and introduce a bias [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The methods based on error propagation theory were used to quantify the uncertainty of individual tree biomass following Berger, Gschwantner, McRoberts, & Schadauer (2014) who provided detailed descriptions of the methodology. Briefly, the methodology quantified the uncertainty in terms of the relative standard deviation (SD), and was composed of four parts (Fig.…”
Section: Overview Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berger, Gschwantner, McRoberts, & Schadauer (2014) showed that a relationship exists between the SD and the size of tree. Therefore, the relationship between the SD and size for each measurement parameter (i.e.…”
Section: The Sd Of Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations