2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11669-019-00710-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Marker Size and Distribution on the Development of Kirkendall Voids, and Coefficients of Interdiffusion and Intrinsic Diffusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The line analysis clearly shows how, starting from the SiO2 fiber and moving horizontally from left to right, one can find only Cu, for about the first 30 microns, until the appearance of what has been identified as the KV area (about 5–10 microns wide); then there is a Cu–Ni alloy interdiffusion zone (about 35 microns wide) with a high concentration of Cu, excluding a few microns near the only-Ni zone, that is, at the right side of the image. Figure 6 also shows that KVs are located in the Cu layer, as already demonstrated in [22,23].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The line analysis clearly shows how, starting from the SiO2 fiber and moving horizontally from left to right, one can find only Cu, for about the first 30 microns, until the appearance of what has been identified as the KV area (about 5–10 microns wide); then there is a Cu–Ni alloy interdiffusion zone (about 35 microns wide) with a high concentration of Cu, excluding a few microns near the only-Ni zone, that is, at the right side of the image. Figure 6 also shows that KVs are located in the Cu layer, as already demonstrated in [22,23].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In this temperature range, the spectrum changes because of a nonlinear stress state, probably due to the formation of the KVs. The presence of voids is undesirable in most load bearing and thermal stressed applications and would significantly undermine the integrity of coatings, as demonstrated in [22]. Figure 5, showing a micrograph of a cross-section view of the sample after the 400 C recovery, confirms that the diffusion phenomena are not present or at least irrelevant before this temperature, becoming significant above 700 C, as shown in the graphs in Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The evacuation and flushing procedure was repeated several times before the quartz tube was sealed, creating a closed, high purity Ar atmosphere for the diffusion couples. More details on diffusion couple fabrication can be found elsewhere. Each diffusion couple was isothermally annealed at 900, 1000, 1100, and 1200 °C for 240, 120, 48, and 24 h, respectively. After annealing, all diffusion couples were water quenched to preserve the high temperature microstructure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For measurement of interdiffusion coefficients, metallographically polished surfaces ( ∼ 1μm surface finish) of two alloys were placed in intimate contact in two stainless steel jigs and held tightly by clamping screws. Details on diffusion couple fabrication for the determination of interdiffusion coefficients have been described elsewhere [28][29][30][31][32][33]. For measurement of tracer diffusion coefficients, an alloy disc polished on both sides was sandwiched between two alloys of the same composition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%