2012
DOI: 10.3354/meps09592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of marine reserves on California spiny lobster are robust and modified by fine-scale habitat features and distance from reserve borders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our analysis did not test for topdown effects, our results suggest that reducing sea urchin biomass will increase reef biodiversity directly and indirectly. At present, fishing has reduced the size and in some cases population abundance of key sea urchin predators [43,78]. Sea otters, voracious urchin predators, have only sporadically recolonized the region since the fur trade in the eighteenth rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org Proc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our analysis did not test for topdown effects, our results suggest that reducing sea urchin biomass will increase reef biodiversity directly and indirectly. At present, fishing has reduced the size and in some cases population abundance of key sea urchin predators [43,78]. Sea otters, voracious urchin predators, have only sporadically recolonized the region since the fur trade in the eighteenth rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org Proc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Kay et al. , Miller and Deacon ). Spatial restrictions can concentrate effort, potentially leading to overharvesting and negative biodiversity impacts, at least in the short term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular concern are the consequences of reallocation of fishing effort in response to the implementation of MPAs where fishing may be regulated. The spatial distribution of fishing effort obviously plays a crucial role in affecting fish resource exploitation (Murawski et al 2005, Cabral et al 2010, Parnell et al 2010, Kay et al 2012, Miller and Deacon 2014. Spatial restrictions can concentrate effort, potentially leading to overharvesting and negative biodiversity impacts, at least in the short term.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under some circumstances, implementation of no-take marine reserves has resulted in increases of biomass and density within stocks subject to high exploitation outside of the reserves (NRC 2001, Halpern 2003, Pande et al 2008, Babcock et al 2010. Empirical evidence suggests that reserves of sufficient size that contain suitable environments to support intact food webs can function as refuges where high densities of large, mature individuals effectively maintain a spawning population (Birkeland and Dayton 2005, Kay et al 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%