2007
DOI: 10.1515/iral.2007.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of manipulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 oral production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
126
5
25

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(23 reference statements)
11
126
5
25
Order By: Relevance
“…Self repairs also help learners to focus on the correct use of the language form (Lyster & Ranta, 1997;Gilabert, 2007). It is not sufficient for learners to just use the language; instead, they need to analyze and evaluate their output (Lazaraton, 2001) and correct their own mistakes in the language use (Bygate & Samuda, 2005).…”
Section: Post-speaking Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self repairs also help learners to focus on the correct use of the language form (Lyster & Ranta, 1997;Gilabert, 2007). It is not sufficient for learners to just use the language; instead, they need to analyze and evaluate their output (Lazaraton, 2001) and correct their own mistakes in the language use (Bygate & Samuda, 2005).…”
Section: Post-speaking Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A central issue in TBLT involves the impact of task complexity on L2 learners' performance. The majority of previous empirical studies have examined the effects of task complexity on L2 learners' oral task performance (Robinson, 1995(Robinson, , 2001(Robinson, , 2007Rahimpour, 1997Rahimpour, , 1999Rahimpour, , 2007Ortega, 1999;Yuan & Ellis, 2003;Gilabert, 2007;Ishikawa, 2008;Kim, 2009) but relatively few studies (Ishikawa, 2006;Kuiken & Vedder, 2007;Kuiken & Vedder, 2008) have investigated the role of task complexity in written performance. It implies that less attention has been paid to the effects of task complexity on written performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complexity measures showed no significant differences among the three conditions. Table 2 shows recent studies in ESL contexts that used interactive tasks and manipulated various task complexity variables such as +/-here-and-now (Gilabert, 2007;Ishikawa, 2006, Saeedi et al, 2012, +/-few elements (Robinson, 2001b;Lee, 2002;Kuiken et al, 2005;Kim, 2009), and +/-no reasoning demand (Iwashita et al, 2001;Nuevo, 2006;Robinson, 2007;Revesz, 2009, 2011, Ismail & Abd. Samad, 2014.…”
Section: Recent Studies On the Relationship Between Task Complexity Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings indicated mixed results with Lee (2002) and Nuevo (2006) reporting that no significant difference was found between manipulation of task complexity variables (+/-few elements and +/-no reasoning demands) and L2 development. However, a number of studies (Robinson, 2001b(Robinson, , 2005(Robinson, , 2007Iwashita et al, 2001;Gilabert, 2007;Kuiken et al, 2005;Ishikawa, 2006, Revesz, 2011 showed positive relationships between increasing complexity levels along the resource-directing dimension and increases in accuracy in L2 speech and/or writing. This would support Robinson's Cognition Hypothesis which posits that increasing the cognitive demands of L2 tasks lead to increases in the accuracy and complexity of L2 speech production (Robinson, 2001a(Robinson, , 2001b(Robinson, , 2005(Robinson, , 2007.…”
Section: Recent Studies On the Relationship Between Task Complexity Amentioning
confidence: 99%