2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of mandibular advancement surgery combined with minimal maxillary displacement on the volume and most restricted cross-sectional area of the pharyngeal airway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Rosario et al [ 3 ]did not report any suspicion on this matter and have included both studies in their meta-analysis, only one[ 42 ] of the articles has been included for the meta-analysis in this overview to avoid potential duplication. Besides, another primary study[ 44 ] meta-analyzed by Rosario et al [ 3 ] was not included in this meta-analysis performed here because the maxillary procedures of that study comprised of those with or without advancement movement. On the other hand, two primary studies[ 45 , 46 ] included but not meta-analyzed by Christovam et al [ 11 ] were found eligible to be included in the meta-analysis of this meta-analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Rosario et al [ 3 ]did not report any suspicion on this matter and have included both studies in their meta-analysis, only one[ 42 ] of the articles has been included for the meta-analysis in this overview to avoid potential duplication. Besides, another primary study[ 44 ] meta-analyzed by Rosario et al [ 3 ] was not included in this meta-analysis performed here because the maxillary procedures of that study comprised of those with or without advancement movement. On the other hand, two primary studies[ 45 , 46 ] included but not meta-analyzed by Christovam et al [ 11 ] were found eligible to be included in the meta-analysis of this meta-analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The position of head and tongue posture has been mentioned to have a big influence on the upper airway dimension in many studies and it has been warned that bias may evolve as a result of lack of a standardized head and tongue posture at the time of image acquisition [ 4 , 8 , 18 , 25-27 , 40-42 ]. A standardized acquisition posture was hence searched for.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the OSA patient, pharyngeal obstruction mostly occurs in the oropharynx [21]. Measuring changes in the most constricted area (minimal cross section), because of collapsibility of the pharynx is regarded as the best parameter to measure treatment outcomes [22]. Prior to the introduction of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), very little information could be obtained from the use of conventional imaging studies, such as lateral cephalometric radiographs to evaluate treatment of the OSA patient [23].…”
Section: Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (Cbct)mentioning
confidence: 99%