1973
DOI: 10.1007/bf02546597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of magnesium on calcification of young bone in tissue culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a relative magnesium-deficient state, vessels exposed to the uremic milieu would readily form the calcium-phosphate complexes, resulting in rapid crystal proliferation (Boskey and Posner, 1980). In vitro evidence suggests that magnesium does not directly affect hydroxyapatite growth; rather, it acts to stabilize the precursor amorphous calcium-phosphate phase (Nielsen, 1973;Tomazic et al, 1975). The current study clearly demonstrates that magnesium supplementation increases the magnesium content relative to calcium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In a relative magnesium-deficient state, vessels exposed to the uremic milieu would readily form the calcium-phosphate complexes, resulting in rapid crystal proliferation (Boskey and Posner, 1980). In vitro evidence suggests that magnesium does not directly affect hydroxyapatite growth; rather, it acts to stabilize the precursor amorphous calcium-phosphate phase (Nielsen, 1973;Tomazic et al, 1975). The current study clearly demonstrates that magnesium supplementation increases the magnesium content relative to calcium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The depletion of bone magnesium store is not the only skeletal effect of magnesium deficiency ; in rats 35-S-mucopolysaccharide and protein syntheses are reduced (Belanger, 1958). In calves, bone calcium accretion and bone calcium catabolism both drop sharply (Larvor, Girard and Brochart, 1964) (Nielsen, 1973), and sheep cartilage calcification was impaired (Cartier and Picard, 1955 (Eastoe, 1961) (Smith and Field, 1963 ;Hunt, 1971 (Rook, 1963) than in calves (Blaxter, Rook and MacDonald, 1954), perhaps because adult bone has very poor Mg exchange ability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Le magnésium osseux est moins mobilisable chez le rat adulte que chez le jeune. Ainsi, Smith et Nisbet (1968,1972) (Kruse, Orent et McCollum, 1932 ;Orent, Kruse et McCollum, 1934 ;Tufts et Greenberg, 1938 (Chiemchaisri et Phillips, 1963), le veau (Blaxter, Rook et McDonald, 1954 ;Larvor et ai., 1964), le lapin (Aikawa et David, 1969), le porc (Miller et ai., 1965aet 19656), le poulain (Harrington, 1975, la poule (Cox et Sell, 1967), et la souris (Nielsen, 1973 Forbes, 1961 ;Blaxter, 1956 ;Lai, Singer et Armstrong, 1975 (Blaxter, 1956), le porc (Miller et al,1965a et (Blaxter, 1956) Belanger,1967 ;Hunt et Belanger,1972 ;Bogoroch et Belanger, 1975). Smith et Nisbet (1968,1972) Rayssiguier, 1977 : rat ; Anast, 1974 : homme ; Heaton,1964 : rat), mais tous les résultats ne concordent pas sur ce point : parfois la parathyroïdectomie est sans effet sur la magnésémie ou le magnésium osseux (Larvor et Durlach, 1971 (1963,1964,1965 (Sorensen, Hindberg et Bank-Mikkelsen, 1971 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified