1984
DOI: 10.2320/matertrans1960.25.257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of <I>In Situ</I> Irradiation by 20 MeV Protons on the Fatigue Properties of 316 Stainless Steel

Abstract: The effects of irradiation on the fatigue properties of stainless steel were studied under the condition of in situ irradiation or after irradiation using 20 MeV protons. Strain controlled fatigue tests using a resonant and a drive force DF at constant were measured in situ during the test. Whereas the present damage rate was very low, the apparent effects of in situ irradiation on the fatigue properties were observed, e.g. the elongation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a matter of fact, the work hardening exponent n [8] estimated fiom the line 1 shown in Fig.1 is as high as n=l (see [6] [4] in which the work hardening exponent n is as low as about 0.2 and fatigue induced precipitates can be observed as black dots in TEM observation [5]. Shortening of Nf for the higher (Ph-PO)IPO range and elongation of Nf for the lower (Ph-Po)IPo range are observed for 3 16F in [5] in which the work hardening exponent n is about 0.33 and the fatigue induced precipitation is intermediate between 316(ST-1) and 3 16SI.…”
Section: N Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a matter of fact, the work hardening exponent n [8] estimated fiom the line 1 shown in Fig.1 is as high as n=l (see [6] [4] in which the work hardening exponent n is as low as about 0.2 and fatigue induced precipitates can be observed as black dots in TEM observation [5]. Shortening of Nf for the higher (Ph-PO)IPO range and elongation of Nf for the lower (Ph-Po)IPo range are observed for 3 16F in [5] in which the work hardening exponent n is about 0.33 and the fatigue induced precipitation is intermediate between 316(ST-1) and 3 16SI.…”
Section: N Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding of the high cycle fatigue property itself may also be important, because the most of the structural reactor materials is expected to be subjected to the high cycle fatigue stresses during the reactor operation. The preliminary work on the Ti-modified AISI 316L stainless steel (see [4] and 316(ST-1) below) indicates that the effect of radiation damage on the fatigue life Nf in the %-controlled tests at 333 K, here elongation in Nf, is much larger under irradiation than after irradiation, where is the total strain amplitude. The firther study on the various modified-3161 stainless steels [5,6] shows that the fatigue hardening mainly governs Nf of the solution treated specimens and in situ radiation damage or thermal pulse modities the fatigue hardening process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 in ref. [3]). An external current applid to the half coil gives a drive force (DF) to the specimen, and an excited flexural resonant vibration of the specimen generates an electrical signal between two ends of the specimen which is proportionl to the amplitude of the resonant vibration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the course of extensive efforts to accumulate the available experimental data on in-situ irradiation fatigue tests, some essential differences in fatigue behavior between in-situ irradiation and post-irradiation conditions have been demonstrated in some works. [1][2][3][4] In a previous paper, 4) stresscontrolled fatigue tests were conducted for 20% cold-worked 316 stainless steel under 17 MeV proton irradiation at 300 C. Substantial increase of fatigue life with prolonged crack propagation was detected in the in-situ irradiation condition. The in-situ irradiation effect on fatigue behavior has been discussed based on the interaction between radiation-induced defect (RID) clusters and moving dislocations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%