2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2008.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of low-pass filtering on the judgment of vocal affect in speech directed to infants, adults and foreigners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate the prosody without the influence of the lexical content, two methods of digital acoustic filtering were employed: (a) prosody unveiling restricted representation (PURR [4]); and (b) lowpass filtering (LPF500 [5]). The former involves eliminating all frequencies above the third harmonic and aperiodic signals, while the latter simply removes all frequencies above 500Hz.…”
Section: Stimuli Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the prosody without the influence of the lexical content, two methods of digital acoustic filtering were employed: (a) prosody unveiling restricted representation (PURR [4]); and (b) lowpass filtering (LPF500 [5]). The former involves eliminating all frequencies above the third harmonic and aperiodic signals, while the latter simply removes all frequencies above 500Hz.…”
Section: Stimuli Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That study did not examine the contribution of filters with frequency cut-offs higher than 400 Hz. However, a lot of indexical (age, sex, social identity) information can actually lie above 400 Hz, which necessitates the use of higher filters such as 700 Hz or 1000 Hz (Knoll et al, 2009). The current study has two aims.…”
Section: Frota Et Al Found That There Is a Rhythmic Distinction Betwmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve this aim, the filter cut-offs were 500, 700, 900 and 1100 Hz, which represents a range of progressively higher filters between the lowinformation cut-off of 400 Hz and unfiltered (or clear) speech. A filter cut-off of 1200 Hz has been previously used in the literature as a bridge between lower filters and unfiltered speech (Knoll et al, 2009). …”
Section: Frota Et Al Found That There Is a Rhythmic Distinction Betwmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…backward speech will have reversed intonation contours. Another masking technique used in paralanguistic studies [5], [6] is low-pass filtering. Low-pass filtering removes high frequencies which are important for speech comprehension (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%