2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/341832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy, 660 nm, in Experimental Septic Arthritis

Abstract: The effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in the presence of an infectious process has not been well elucidated. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of LLLT in an experimental model of septic arthritis. Methods. Twenty-one Wistar rats were divided as follows: control group, no bacteria; placebo group, bacteria were inoculated; Treated group, bacteria were injected and treatment with LLLTwas performed. To assess nociception, a von Frey digital analgesimeter was applied. Synovial fluid was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38 On the contrary, Araujo et al did not observe any antibacterial effect on a model of septic arthritis in rats, but it should be noted that although a similar dose was used (2 J/cm 2 ), the intraarticular penetration of the 660-nm wavelength that was used was very limited. 59 Vasheghani et al did not observe an antimicrobial effect on third-degree burns in rats either, but in their case, a much lower dose (0.396 J/cm 2 ) was used. 60 The use of doses above 10 J/cm 2 for wounds remains controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…38 On the contrary, Araujo et al did not observe any antibacterial effect on a model of septic arthritis in rats, but it should be noted that although a similar dose was used (2 J/cm 2 ), the intraarticular penetration of the 660-nm wavelength that was used was very limited. 59 Vasheghani et al did not observe an antimicrobial effect on third-degree burns in rats either, but in their case, a much lower dose (0.396 J/cm 2 ) was used. 60 The use of doses above 10 J/cm 2 for wounds remains controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In vitro studies suggest that light at wavelengths between 625-1000 nm (from red to infrared) when applied alone does not induce increased growth of bacteria such as S. aureus and P. aeruginosa (Lipovsky et al, 2010;Lee et al, 2011;Baffoni et al, 2012;Costa and Assis, 2012;Araujo et al, 2013;Kim et al, 2013;Pereira et al, 2014). This suggests that such wavelengths do not interact with chromophores known to exist in these infectious agents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Various treatments have been suggested for this pathologic condition including total hip arthroplasty, cell therapy with mesenchymal stromal cells, 4 trans-trochanteric rotational osteotomy, 5 using novel calcium phosphate (CPC) composite scaffold, which contains BMP-VEGFloaded poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid microspheres, 6 core decompression and autologous bone marrow concentrate, 3 and tensor fascia lata muscle pedicle grafting. 7 Some evidence shows that low-level laser irradiation can improve wound healing 8,9 and pain relief in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders, 10 and may successfully be used in treatment of some pathological conditions like Achilles tendon injury in animal models, 11 cartilage defects, 12 experimental septic arthritis, 13 inflammatory and rheumatic diseases, 14 and other musculoskeletal lesions. Some clinical randomized control trials report the effectiveness of LLLT in musculoskeletal pains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%