2012
DOI: 10.3892/or.2012.1816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on osteosarcoma and cancer cells

Abstract: Abstract. Metastatic bone tumors cause pain and pathological fractures due to bone destruction. If we could enhance new osteogenic activities and prevent progression of osteolytic change by malignant cells, patients could achieve satisfactory activity of daily living. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS), which leads to bone formation by osteoblasts, has been used for the treatment of fractures. LIPUS has been reported to enhance the effect of an anticancer drug on lymphoma and liver cancer cells. However, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The proliferation rate and the clonogenicity of colorectal cancer cells were not affected by LIPUS at 24 hr after the exposure (Figure 1). These results might appear apparently in contrast with the ones by Sawai et al (2012) who reported that LIPUS decreases the proliferation of osteosarcoma cells. We believe this discrepancy might be due to the different cell types used in these studies and, especially, to the different schedule of LIPUS treatment.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proliferation rate and the clonogenicity of colorectal cancer cells were not affected by LIPUS at 24 hr after the exposure (Figure 1). These results might appear apparently in contrast with the ones by Sawai et al (2012) who reported that LIPUS decreases the proliferation of osteosarcoma cells. We believe this discrepancy might be due to the different cell types used in these studies and, especially, to the different schedule of LIPUS treatment.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…We believe this discrepancy might be due to the different cell types used in these studies and, especially, to the different schedule of LIPUS treatment. Indeed, the cited authors administered LIPUS for 20 min every day for the duration of their experiment (up to 72 hr) while we only administered a 30 s pulse and analyzed cells after 24 hr (Sawai et al, 2012). Experiments are ongoing to evaluate the effects of a more prolonged (chronic) exposure of cells to LIPUS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1C) (Sawai et al, 2012). Our finding that LIPUS stimulation enhances the Rac1-dependent migration of fibroblasts (Fig.…”
Section: Promotion Of Cell Motility By Lipus Stimulationsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Previous reports have revealed that LIPUS stimulated the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and Akt in osteosarcoma cell lines (21) as well as the activation of ERK1/2 in osteosarcoma cells, which have been induced to undergo apoptosis and autophagy (24). In addition, Akt may induce apoptosis via inhibition of Chk1 (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There have been several studies reporting that LIPUS has antitumor effects via the induction of apoptosis in cancer cells (19)(20)(21)(22)(23). For example, LIPUS was previously demonstrated to induce apoptosis by causing membrane damage in human leukemia cells (19), affecting the Ca 2+ /mitochondrial pathway in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells (23) and enhancing adjuvant chemotherapy in cases of lymphoma (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%