2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-0960.2001.00507.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of low‐dose ultraviolet radiation on in vivo human cutaneous recall responses

Abstract: Relatively few studies have examined the effects of low-dose ultraviolet (UV) radiation on in vivo human cutaneous immunity, or the ability of sunscreens to prevent UV-induced immunosuppression. We have studied the effects of solar-simulated UV radiation on nickel contact hypersensitivity (CHS) in nickel-allergic volunteers, and on delayed type hypersensitivity responses in Mantoux-positive volunteers. Nickel CHS and Mantoux responses were significantly suppressed by acute, suberythemal UV exposures equivalent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed a UVR dose-dependent increase in the percentage of photoimmunosuppression of the nickel CHS response that reached 43% at the highest SSR dose used. Our findings were consistent with those of Damian et al (20) who reported that immunosuppression can be induced by low doses of SSR. The current study suggested that n23 PUFAs are protective against photoimmunosuppression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We observed a UVR dose-dependent increase in the percentage of photoimmunosuppression of the nickel CHS response that reached 43% at the highest SSR dose used. Our findings were consistent with those of Damian et al (20) who reported that immunosuppression can be induced by low doses of SSR. The current study suggested that n23 PUFAs are protective against photoimmunosuppression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…UVR reduces CMI in human skin in a dose-dependent manner (20,21), and this effect can be quantified by measuring the inhibition of immune responses to recall antigens applied topically or injected into the skin (22). Nickel is frequently used as the recall antigen because contact hypersensitivity (CHS) to this metal is common in the population and affects w15% of women and w5% of men (23).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that people living in the northeast USA have a higher risk of RA, 1 2 which may be due to lower ultraviolet (UV) light exposure. In experimental studies, UV radiation acts as an immunosuppressant by up-regulating Th2 cells and down-regulating Th1 cells, [3][4][5] inducing interleukin-10 production, an anti-inflammatory cytokine, as well as the production of T-regulatory cells. [6][7][8][9][10] UV-B (from 290 to 315 nm) exposure causes both sunburn and skin damage and stimulates cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D and could thus decrease risk of RA through increasing vitamin D, which has known immunomodulating effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UK group has shown that susceptibility to immunosuppression (induction of CHS) is skin type dependent (Kelly et al, 2000), with skin types I/II being more readily suppressed than skin types III/IV. But the Australian group found no relationship between susceptibility to sunburn, which is roughly skin type dependent, and susceptibility to suppression of the elicitation of CHS to nickel (Damian et al, 2001).…”
Section: Methodology Used By the Five Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%