2006
DOI: 10.3176/biol.ecol.2006.3.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of long-term non-point eutrophication on the abundance and biomass of macrozoobenthos in small lakes of Estonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nutrient reduction in nutrient‐rich waters may benefit mussels by limiting algal blooms and the development of hypoxic conditions as algae decomposes. Highly eutrophic conditions can be harmful to mussels: in the River Jorka in Poland, nutrient enrichment may have contributed to the extirpation of some unionid species at sites experiencing periods of anoxia (Kołodziejczyk et al, 2009 ), and in a study of Estonian lakes, mussel density reductions were linked to eutrophication‐driven hypoxia (Timm et al, 2006 ). Conversely, nutrient reduction in nutrient‐poor waters may be harmful to mussels since reduced algal growth may start to limit food availability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nutrient reduction in nutrient‐rich waters may benefit mussels by limiting algal blooms and the development of hypoxic conditions as algae decomposes. Highly eutrophic conditions can be harmful to mussels: in the River Jorka in Poland, nutrient enrichment may have contributed to the extirpation of some unionid species at sites experiencing periods of anoxia (Kołodziejczyk et al, 2009 ), and in a study of Estonian lakes, mussel density reductions were linked to eutrophication‐driven hypoxia (Timm et al, 2006 ). Conversely, nutrient reduction in nutrient‐poor waters may be harmful to mussels since reduced algal growth may start to limit food availability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Revisiting the site first surveyed by Negus in 1964 offers the opportunity to add to a developing picture of mussel decline across Europe (e.g. Arter, 1989 ; Lewandowski & Kołodziejczyk, 2014 ; Ożgo et al, 2021 ; Timm et al, 2006 ). Significantly, these data also allow us to assess changes in individual growth rates, leading to changing secondary production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%