1999
DOI: 10.1007/s004680050003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of long-term CO 2 enrichment and nutrient availability in Norway spruce. II. Foliar chemistry

Abstract: Bud phenology and shoot elongation growth were monitored on Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) trees grown inside glass domes with adjustable windows for six years under ambient (355 µmol CO 2 •mol-1) and elevated (700 µmol CO 2 •mol-1) atmospheric CO 2 concentrations CO 2. Each treatment consisted of two stand densities-sparse (5,000 trees•ha-1) and dense (10,000 trees•ha-1). The age of spruce trees was 10 years at the beginning of the experiment. Elevated CO 2 slightly accelerated the consequential bud … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low concentrations of these elements may reflect high levels of export of C compounds, as both may be part of the phloem loading process (Roberntz and Linder 1999), or be the result of their role as a counter ion to negatively charged C compounds (Marschner et al 1996). Overstorey removal will also reduce litter and throughfall inputs of these elements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Low concentrations of these elements may reflect high levels of export of C compounds, as both may be part of the phloem loading process (Roberntz and Linder 1999), or be the result of their role as a counter ion to negatively charged C compounds (Marschner et al 1996). Overstorey removal will also reduce litter and throughfall inputs of these elements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Within the realm of CO 2 research with forest trees, investigations of nutritional responses other than those of N have been infrequent, but where nutrients other than N were measured, the responses to elevated CO 2 were either not significant or most often smaller than those of N (Murray et al 1996;Hättenschwiler and Körner 1998;Gifford et al 2000;Walker et al 2000). A common explanation for reduced concentrations of plant nutrients under elevated CO 2 is dilution by larger concentrations of non-structural carbohydrates (Roberntz and Linder 1999;Körner 2000). However, this dilution would be the same for all nutrients and, thus, the decrease of the N:nutrient ratios indicates that the reduction in tree N goes beyond a simple dilution signal.…”
Section: Soil-dependent Co 2 Effects On Nutrient Accumulation In Beecmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Usually, CO 2 enrichment reduces plant N concentrations (reviewed by Cotrufo et al 1998) and often increases the immobilization of N in soils (Niklaus et al 1998;Hungate et al 1999), indicating that elevated atmospheric CO 2 stimulates the competition of plants and microbes for N. The effects of CO 2 enrichment on other nutrients are less consistent. In plant tissues, they range from decreased to increased concentrations under elevated CO 2 (Roberntz and Linder 1999;Gifford et al 2000;Walker et al 2000). In the soil, reports on the impact of CO 2 enrichment on exchangeable nutrients other than N are scarce, but they suggest that these CO 2 effects are relatively small .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Concentrations were probably diluted as a result of CO 2 -induced stimulation of needle growth (increased structural carbon) and/or an accumulation of non-structural carbohydrates, e.g. starch (Roberntz and Linder 1999;Utriainen et al 2000;Liu et al 2004Liu et al , 2005. The growth response (also of Wne roots) to CO 2 suggests that N deWciency (limitation) was not acute, rather latent (Johnson et al 1998).…”
Section: Evects Of Elevated Comentioning
confidence: 96%