5th International Symposium on Fluid Structure Interaction, Aeroelasticity, and Flow Induced Vibration and Noise 2002
DOI: 10.1115/imece2002-32837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Loading Conditions and Types of Motion on PWR Fuel Rod Cladding Wear

Abstract: The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of types of motion and loading conditions on the wear of Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) fuel rod cladding made of Zircaloy-4 in contact with a grid support cell. Fretting-wear tests, for various combinations of motion and preload, were conducted at 310°C and 11.7 MPa using primary circuit water chemistry. Wear coefficients, derived from three-dimensional profilometry, were used to assess the severity of the wear process. The types of motion and the lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Selected cladding wear data from the literature are listed in Table 8. A higher pre-load in the AECL assembly seems to decrease the wear coefficient because of the reduced relative motion between the grid and rod [18]. In contrast, in the current work, a higher load increases the wear coefficient of a cladding in as-received condition when rubbed against either the springs or the dimples.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Selected cladding wear data from the literature are listed in Table 8. A higher pre-load in the AECL assembly seems to decrease the wear coefficient because of the reduced relative motion between the grid and rod [18]. In contrast, in the current work, a higher load increases the wear coefficient of a cladding in as-received condition when rubbed against either the springs or the dimples.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Pre-oxidized A commercially-made reciprocating test machine (Ducom TM Instruments, Chicago, USA) was modified for fretting tests ( The test parameters of two other GTRF simulators, the VIPER loop test at Westinghouse and the CANFRET test at AECL (Canada), are listed in Table 2, respectively (based on information in [11,18]…”
Section: As-receivedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, our simulations predict that irradiation growth and creep have a non-negligible contribution to the gap opening. While there is not much quantitative data available in the literature regarding gap opening during in-reactor conditions, out-of-reactor experiments on fuel rod assemblies generally use a transverse displacement amplitude in the range 5-30 μm for grid-to-rod fretting wear tests [7], [43]. In another analytical study [18], a grid-to-rod gap of 10 μm was predicted at end of life for Zircaloy-4 spacer grid and clad, with consideration for irradiation growth and creep using phenomenological constitutive models.…”
Section: Evolution Of Contact Openingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has been directed at understanding the involved phenomena and alleviating the root causes responsible for GTR fretting wear. Out-of-reactor experiments study the effect on the wear characteristics of coolant flow induced vibrations and pressure fluctuations [7]- [9], of spring and dimple geometries [10]- [12], and of pre-sized gaps between the spacer grid and the fuel rods [9], [13]. In these experiments, the gaps between the springs and dimples and the fuel rod are generally pre-set to account for the effect of irradiation-induced contact relaxation and cladding creep at the end of life (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the nuclear component modeling, one of these parameters i.e. wear volume parameter is used that led to the development of ''work rate model'' which in turn is used to find out the wear in the tubes that are used in nuclear steam generator [4] and nuclear fuel tubes [5]. This is given as Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%