2017
DOI: 10.1144/qjegh2016-049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of lithofacies and environment on in situ and laboratory Schmidt hammer tests: a case study of carbonate rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many researchers have been questioning its destructive nature and the potential complications involved in handling, preparing, and testing the samples, particularly in weak rocks. Nevertheless, even for hard rocks like carbonates (limestone), the UCS test is still very difficult, expensive, tedious, and time-consuming, and it requires to test a number of well-prepared rock samples in order to obtain consistent strength value for the rock material [3][4][5][6][7][8] . Frequently, nondestructive indirect methods like Schmidt hammer, Shore hardness, slake durability, P-wave velocity, point load index test, etc.…”
Section: Several Machine Learning Techniques Comparison For the Predi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many researchers have been questioning its destructive nature and the potential complications involved in handling, preparing, and testing the samples, particularly in weak rocks. Nevertheless, even for hard rocks like carbonates (limestone), the UCS test is still very difficult, expensive, tedious, and time-consuming, and it requires to test a number of well-prepared rock samples in order to obtain consistent strength value for the rock material [3][4][5][6][7][8] . Frequently, nondestructive indirect methods like Schmidt hammer, Shore hardness, slake durability, P-wave velocity, point load index test, etc.…”
Section: Several Machine Learning Techniques Comparison For the Predi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods have been continuously used as an alternative method since they are simple, more practical and do not require complicated procedures on the testing equipment. Besides, these methods are faster and more economical compared to the traditionally-suggested UCS testing methods 6,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] .…”
Section: Several Machine Learning Techniques Comparison For the Predi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nummulitic limestone with marl beds is also available in different localized outcrops. The Early Oligocene Asmari Formation, aged 34–29 Myr, comprising mainly gypsiferous mudstone, nummulitic marly limestone, chalky and dolomitic limestone, and marl, is the youngest rock unit in the study area 22 .…”
Section: Study Area and Geological Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inhomogeneity and rapid changes in the physical properties of rock masses commonly cause unexpected rock failure, particularly when these factors are combined with the presence of water. All these factors underline the importance of measuring the rock strength via in situ or laboratory methods (Marinos and Hoek 2001;Erguler and Ulusay 2009;Yilmaz 2010;Arman et al 2013aArman et al , b, 2014Arman et al , 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%