2004
DOI: 10.1205/026387604322870453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Liquid Physical Properties on the Forces Acting on a Pipe Bend in Gas–Liquid Slug Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Formula (1) is derived from a control volume (CV) around the elbow [22] and has been used to calculate the average pressure (F/A) at a bend [10,11] or on a vertical plate [8]. For steady slug flows, the velocity range is relatively low (0.1 to 5 m/s [1]), so that the generated impact pressure is small (less than 0.25 bar) and no damage is to be expected [8,10,11]. This is the reason why we stated above that steady slugs are not important for us.…”
Section: Slug Velocity and Impact Force At The Elbowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Formula (1) is derived from a control volume (CV) around the elbow [22] and has been used to calculate the average pressure (F/A) at a bend [10,11] or on a vertical plate [8]. For steady slug flows, the velocity range is relatively low (0.1 to 5 m/s [1]), so that the generated impact pressure is small (less than 0.25 bar) and no damage is to be expected [8,10,11]. This is the reason why we stated above that steady slugs are not important for us.…”
Section: Slug Velocity and Impact Force At The Elbowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a water slug emerging from the end of a horizontal pipe and impacting on a vertical plate, Sakaguchi et al [8] measured and modeled the generated force. The dynamics of a slug in nearly horizontal pipes [9], a vertical pipe with a bend [10] and an 'S' shaped riser [11] was measured and modeled. In these studies, the slug was assumed to be continuous (coherent liquid column of finite length) and steady.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is pertinent to obtain time varying measurements of the impact and some slug characteristics, including slug velocity, liquid hold-up and pressure at the inlet and outlet of the bend that contribute to this impact. It has been shown that isolating the bend from the upstream and downstream pipe works is vital (Tay and Thorpe, 2002, 2004, 2014Fairhurst, 1983;Hargreaves and Slocombe, 1998). The experimental data discussed in this paper was collected from the same experimental rig used by Tay and Thorpe (2002, 2004, 2014.…”
Section: Experiments Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several experimental studies have been carried out in order to understand the nature of forces caused by slug flow in pipelines (Sanchez et al, 1998) followed by (Tay and Thorpe, 2002). It is generally accepted that the short hydrodynamic slugs are the main cause of destructive forces in pipe bends and fittings (Tay and Thorpe, 2004). When the pipeline is operated at relatively low pressure and flow rates, long slugs may appear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%