2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0963-9969(00)00093-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of lipids on mechanical and moisture barrier properties of edible gellan film

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
171
1
32

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 310 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
25
171
1
32
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were reported by Yang and Paulson (2000) for the addition of stearic acid, palmitic acid and beeswax to gellan emulsion films.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similar results were reported by Yang and Paulson (2000) for the addition of stearic acid, palmitic acid and beeswax to gellan emulsion films.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…10a) indicated that WVTR initially increase with glycerol, but later on decreased after reaching to a certain maxima. It could be due to increase in inter chain spacing due to inclusion of glycerol molecules between the polymer chain which may promote water vapor diffusability through the film and hence accelerate the water vapor transmission (Yang and Paulson 2000). Gontard et al (1993) stated that the increase of water vapor permeability might be related to the hydrophillicity of all tested plasticizers.…”
Section: Water Vapour Transmission Rate (Wvtr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of scanning electron microscopy to observe the morphology of the Development of films based on gluten from wheat flours, Tanada-Palmu e Grosso surface of the film was efficient in evaluating the films containing mixtures of polysaccharide-fatty acids or polysaccharide-beeswax and their functional properties [45]. In this case for films from different glutens, it was not possible to observe any significant morphological difference between semi-hard EMBRAPA 22 ( Figure 1) and vital gluten (Figure 3), but the soft gluten film showed one more open matrix surface morphology which could be capable of explaining functional differences such as the worst barrier properties or mechanical resistance compared to the other films.…”
Section: -Scanning Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%