2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.04.143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of levosimendan versus dobutamine on long-term survival of patients with cardiogenic shock after primary coronary angioplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…59 Mild QTc prolongation, no proarrhythmia. 60 Possible survival benefit vs conventional inotropes, 62,63 although not borne out in larger trials. 64 Increases mean APD 50 by 9 to 17 ms and mean APD 90 by 5 to 15 ms in healthy volunteers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 Mild QTc prolongation, no proarrhythmia. 60 Possible survival benefit vs conventional inotropes, 62,63 although not borne out in larger trials. 64 Increases mean APD 50 by 9 to 17 ms and mean APD 90 by 5 to 15 ms in healthy volunteers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the LEAF study [23], more episodes of hypotension occurred during the levosimendan infusion when compared to placebo treatment, but there was no significant difference in blood pressure at the end of the infusion when comparing the 2 groups. These small studies [11,12,13,14,23] indicate that levosimendan is a safe drug for use in AMI and does not increase the incidence of myocardial ischemia, mortality or serious arrhythmias. In addition, it appears that levosimendan may decrease the incidence of worsening heart failure and/or mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several studies showing that levosimendan is a safe drug for use in patients with AMI and that it does not increase the incidence of myocardial ischemia or other events; these were, however, small studies or case reports. Furthermore, they tended to include special cases, such as those undergoing cardiac surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention, and included only a few patients with nonrevascularization [11,12,13,14,15,16]. Therefore, it is essential that trials examining the safety and clinical efficacy of levosimendan are conducted, with larger sample sizes and including patients with nonrevascularization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The short-term hemodynamic effect was found to be comparable to the IABP outcome. 32 In patients with cardioplegic shock revascularized with levo primary PCI, levosimendan improves LV diastolic functions obtained via Doppler echocardiography; 33 however, it does not improve the long-term mortality. 34 The use of this drug in STEMI cases complicated by cardioplegic shock has been investigated only in small studies (Table 3); therefore further studies are warranted.…”
Section: Use Of Levosimendan In Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coromentioning
confidence: 99%