2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of leaf litter consumption by millipedes (Harpaphe haydeniana) on subsequent decomposition depends on litter type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
3
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
23
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regressions with P values <0.05 are in bold (*: P < 0.05;**: P < 0.01). responses, our data suggest that the conflicting results from previous studies, reporting either a higher (Hassall et al, 1987;Maraun and Scheu, 1996;Frouz and Simek, 2009) or lower microbial biomass in feces than in the uningested litter (Rawlins et al, 2007;Frouz and Simek, 2009;Suzuki et al, 2013), may in part be due to the variable leaf litter material used in these studies.…”
Section: Tablecontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regressions with P values <0.05 are in bold (*: P < 0.05;**: P < 0.01). responses, our data suggest that the conflicting results from previous studies, reporting either a higher (Hassall et al, 1987;Maraun and Scheu, 1996;Frouz and Simek, 2009) or lower microbial biomass in feces than in the uningested litter (Rawlins et al, 2007;Frouz and Simek, 2009;Suzuki et al, 2013), may in part be due to the variable leaf litter material used in these studies.…”
Section: Tablecontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Increased microbial respiration in fresh feces was observed in some studies (Hassall et al, 1987;Maraun and Scheu, 1996;Frouz and Simek, 2009), but unchanged or even reduced microbial respiration in fresh feces compared to leaf litter was also reported (Maraun and Scheu, 1996;Frouz and Simek, 2009;Suzuki et al, 2013; Spaldo nov a and Frouz, 2014). Several different explanations can be put forward for these apparently contradictory results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Soil macrofauna are considered important for ecological intensification of crop production as they are involved in key soil functions such as decomposition and nutrient cycling (Pramanik, Sarkar, & Joy, 2001;Moura, Aguiar, Piedade, & Rousseaux, 2015) and water infiltration (Bottinelli et al, 2010). However, the efficiency of these organisms depends upon abiotic factors such as diversity, quantity and quality of residues (Suzuky, Grayston, & Prescott, 2013). The positive interactions between the functional group components of the soil macrofauna and soil residue cover may increase the efficiency of tropical agrosystems (Moura et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that the decomposition changes the stable C isotope ratio (d 13 C); some leaves showed increasing trends (Wedin et al, 1995;Osono et al, 2006), whereas others showed decreasing trends (Benner et al, 1987) or non-linear patterns (Mellilo et al, 1989;Connin et al, 2001). Understanding the litter decomposition process, and factors that affect it, can help in the understanding of carbon fluxes within ecosystems (Prescott, 2010;Suzuki et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%