Effects of Leadership Style on Organizational Performance: A Survey of Selected Small Scale Enterprises in Ikosi-Ketu Council Development Area of Lagos State, Nigeria
Abstract:This study has investigated the effects of leadership style on organizational performance in small scale enterprises. The major objective was to determine effect of leadership styles on performance in small scale enterprises. Transformational and transactional leadership styles were considered in this study. Transformational leadership behaviours and performance/outcome considered relevant in the study were charisma, inspirational motivation and intellectual stimulation/individual consideration; and effectiven… Show more
“…As a result, leaders may use a transactional leadership style that relies on expectations (Ojokuku et al, 2012). The leader can also lead in an autocratic style, which means all organization members follow orders (Obiwuru et al, 2011). Leadership can focus on values, ethics, skills, or motivation by embracing transformational leadership.…”
Section: Leadership Styles and Sustainable Organizational Energymentioning
PurposeThis study aims to understand the impact of leadership styles on the sustainability of organizational energy, using the mediator role of organizational ambidexterity in family firms in Malaysia. To this end, dual-stage Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) were adopted to determine the leadership style of family firms in Malaysia.Design/methodology/approachAn exploratory design (i.e. questionnaire) was used to collect data from 528 workers in the family firms in Malaysia.FindingsAccording to the results, leadership styles and long-term organizational energy have a positive and significant relationship. Furthermore, organizational ambidexterity mediates the relationship between leadership styles and organizational energy sustainability. On the other hand, based on nonlinear and compensatory relationships, the ANN method predicted a bureaucratic leadership style typical in Malaysian family businesses. The results of this study indicate transformational, transactional and bureaucratic leadership styles affect sustainable organizational energy. Besides, organizational ambidexterity fully mediates the relationship between leadership styles and sustainable organizational energy. On the other hand, the results of non-compensatory relationships revealed organizational ambidexterity is the most determinant of sustainable organizational energy, followed by bureaucratic leadership. As a result, leadership styles encourage human resources to perform tasks with energy and vitality. In family businesses, bureaucratic leadership increases job immersion and positive motivations toward work challenges.Research limitations/implicationsFrom a practitioner's perspective, leaders and practitioners must encourage creativity and idea generation to give members sufficient strength to work and focus on goals that support building sustainable organizational energy. A family business is a type of capitalism that significantly impacts employees. The family-owned businesses surveyed by first-generation families lack subsidiaries and are ingrained in a paternalistic culture that offers employees greater security at a lower wage. Although there are few details, the study sample size is small and has limitations. This study suggests that understanding the leadership styles on sustainable organizational energy and using the mediator role of organizational ambidexterity in the family business has immense value. Characteristics such as transformational, transactional and bureaucratic leadership styles have a significant role in sustainable organizational energy. Also, organizational ambidexterity is the mediator for the relationship between leadership styles and sustainable organizational energy.Originality/valueThis study sheds light on the effect of leadership styles on sustainable organizational energy through organizational ambidexterity in family firms. In this context, the novelty of this study includes two perceptions. The first explored the impact of exploration and exploitation on sustainable organizational energy. The second investigates linear and nonlinear relationships to predict sustainable organizational energy determinants.
“…As a result, leaders may use a transactional leadership style that relies on expectations (Ojokuku et al, 2012). The leader can also lead in an autocratic style, which means all organization members follow orders (Obiwuru et al, 2011). Leadership can focus on values, ethics, skills, or motivation by embracing transformational leadership.…”
Section: Leadership Styles and Sustainable Organizational Energymentioning
PurposeThis study aims to understand the impact of leadership styles on the sustainability of organizational energy, using the mediator role of organizational ambidexterity in family firms in Malaysia. To this end, dual-stage Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) were adopted to determine the leadership style of family firms in Malaysia.Design/methodology/approachAn exploratory design (i.e. questionnaire) was used to collect data from 528 workers in the family firms in Malaysia.FindingsAccording to the results, leadership styles and long-term organizational energy have a positive and significant relationship. Furthermore, organizational ambidexterity mediates the relationship between leadership styles and organizational energy sustainability. On the other hand, based on nonlinear and compensatory relationships, the ANN method predicted a bureaucratic leadership style typical in Malaysian family businesses. The results of this study indicate transformational, transactional and bureaucratic leadership styles affect sustainable organizational energy. Besides, organizational ambidexterity fully mediates the relationship between leadership styles and sustainable organizational energy. On the other hand, the results of non-compensatory relationships revealed organizational ambidexterity is the most determinant of sustainable organizational energy, followed by bureaucratic leadership. As a result, leadership styles encourage human resources to perform tasks with energy and vitality. In family businesses, bureaucratic leadership increases job immersion and positive motivations toward work challenges.Research limitations/implicationsFrom a practitioner's perspective, leaders and practitioners must encourage creativity and idea generation to give members sufficient strength to work and focus on goals that support building sustainable organizational energy. A family business is a type of capitalism that significantly impacts employees. The family-owned businesses surveyed by first-generation families lack subsidiaries and are ingrained in a paternalistic culture that offers employees greater security at a lower wage. Although there are few details, the study sample size is small and has limitations. This study suggests that understanding the leadership styles on sustainable organizational energy and using the mediator role of organizational ambidexterity in the family business has immense value. Characteristics such as transformational, transactional and bureaucratic leadership styles have a significant role in sustainable organizational energy. Also, organizational ambidexterity is the mediator for the relationship between leadership styles and sustainable organizational energy.Originality/valueThis study sheds light on the effect of leadership styles on sustainable organizational energy through organizational ambidexterity in family firms. In this context, the novelty of this study includes two perceptions. The first explored the impact of exploration and exploitation on sustainable organizational energy. The second investigates linear and nonlinear relationships to predict sustainable organizational energy determinants.
“…Thus, inconsistent with the competency theory and stewardship theory, the results show that the leadership competency of the board does not influence the sustainability practice that could enhance the cash holding of the firms. However, it is probable that the competency of the board focuses more on the mobilisation of corporate resources in strategizing for cash holding (Obiwuru et al , 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, we consider the variations by which CSC can explain CCH given the important role of the corporate board in setting the tone for corporate sustainability. As leaders can influence the effectiveness of the mobilisation of corporate resources (Obiwuru et al , 2011), the most basic scenario would be the tendency of the board to influence CSC adaptation. From a stewardship perspective, the leaders own ethical duties to more than just the shareholders or principal and sought to balance those interests with the multiple interests of other stakeholders.…”
Purpose
This paper aims to examine the association between corporate sustainability commitment and cash holding and whether the board’s leadership competency moderates the association.
Design/methodology/approach
The sample consisted of Islamic banks in Malaysia from 2017 to 2019. The sustainability commitment was measured based on the dimensions of the economic, social and environment of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG).
Findings
The sustainability commitment of the Islamic banks are low. The regression results are not supportive of the hypotheses on the association between corporate sustainability commitment and cash holding and the moderating effect of board’s leadership competency.
Research limitations/implications
The Islamic banks in Malaysia are still in their early stages to achieve the SDGs, but the trend of disclosure suggests that they are gradually embracing the commitment to sustainability practices. It is in support of the agency theory, with findings indicating greater agency cost that is perceived upon companies with greater sustainability commitments.
Originality/value
This paper integrates the dimensions of the SDG with the value-based intermediation guideline by Bank Negara Malaysia in measuring sustainability commitment of Islamic banks.
“…< 0.05) (Desderio, 2016). The positive influence of TL on OP results from transformational leaders' ability to motivate followers to make extra effort and focus on the whole organisation rather than self-interests alone, and to encourage innovation, goal achievement, pride and optimism about the future, thereby achieving better OP (Avolio, 2007;Desderio, 2016;Obiwuru et al, 2011;Wahab et al, 2016). Besides the above reasons for improved performance, the transformational leaders' development of organisational goals and empowerment of followers also aids in improving OP (Dhanphat et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transformational leadership is usually conceptualised as consisting of four dimensions: charisma or idealised influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individualised consideration through which leaders ensure individuals transcend personal interests and pursue the interests of the organisation and group (Bass & Riggio, 2006;Cavazotte et al, 2013). Transformational leaders foster innovation that boosts performance and motivates followers to go beyond self-interest and focus on higher organisational goals (Noruzy et al, 2013;Obiwuru et al, 2011). In both developed and developing countries, a positive relationship between TL and OP is apparent (Desderio, 2016;İşcan et al, 2014;Koech & Namusonge, 2012;Omira, 2015;Peterson et al, 2009).…”
Section: Organisational Performance and Transformational Leadershipmentioning
Purpose: Poor leadership skills are often one reason for poor performance in emerging economies’ state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Research on transformational leadership’s (TL) effectiveness in the public sector is limited and sometimes contradictory and incomplete. The present study sought to develop and test a TL and organisational performance (OP) model that includes the role of soft influence tactics and leader–follower relationship quality.Design/methodology/approach: Quantitative predictive research was used. The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire-5X, Influence Behaviour Questionnaire, Leader-Member Exchange Questionnaire, and an adapted measure of OP were used to collect data from 302 staff members from 12 SOEs and government officials from line Ministries in an emerging economy. Variance-based structural equation modelling was used in data analysis.Findings/results: The findings show that the relationship between TL and OP is complex. Although TL directly influences OP, it also does so through soft proactive influence tactics (sPIT) and leader–follower relationship quality. Transformational leadership, proactive influence tactics and leader–follower relationship quality combined explained 47% of the variance in OP.Practical implications: State-owned enterprise leaders and management should take note that TL, proactive influence tactics and the quality of leader–follower relationships can be integrated to influence OP positively and significantly.Originality/value: This research provides additional knowledge to the limited research available on SOEs in emerging economies. Furthermore, it reveals that sPITs and leader–follower relationship quality influence the relationship between TL and OP in these SOEs. This addresses a knowledge gap concerning the leadership-OP relationship.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.